lagilman: coffee or die (just sayin' - Nate)
Today, I am fighting off the urge to explain to people the difference between depression ("I'm feeling depressed about that,") and Depression, the clinical state. Confusing them does nobody any good - you can't "make someone feel better" when they have Depression.

On the other hand, scolding someone who is talking about depression for not using the proper terms of Depression doesn't do anyone any good, either. Because people DO get depressed for reasons that have nothing to do with the chemical causes of Depression, and they shouldn't be made to feel worse because someone else thinks only in terms of the clinical form and penalizes all others to the point of abusing a person who's already feeling bad.

Should there be different common terms for the clinical and non-clinical state? Possibly. Until then, can we at least read the context before we go off on someone for using the terms? Sometimes "I'm depressed" just means they're (justifiably) depressed. Not that they have Depression.

Eeyore thanks you.


(this grumble brought to you by somebody else's rant on Tumblr)
lagilman: coffee or die (madness toll)
And with the push of the send tab, SOUL OF FIRE (Portals #2) is off to Madame Editrix.  It will come back to me for dire revisions, as she points out all the mis-builds I was too in-the-guts to see, but right now I'm feeling pretty good about the book, and the duology overall.  You'll get to see the results in August (Heart of Briar) and October (Soul of Fire) 2013.

Having hit send, I then tried to figure out how many words I've written (novels and short stories, but not including multiple rewrites of same) in 2012. I'd say 350,00-ish, best guesstimate.  No wonder my brain now feels like a slice of processed cheese food.  Worse: if I do as planned in December, it will hit over 400,000.  

I may have done more the year I was writing one Vineart book and two Cosa Nostradamus novels, plus short fiction, but considering that was the year Madame Agent said "don't do that again...."

Anyway.  On to happier thoughts! Ebookses! That you can buy!

DRAGON VIRUS is now available at Amazon and B&N, for those of you who prefer to stick with your regular ebook dealer bookseller. It will, I hope also be up soon at Wizard's Tower, and various other indie sites.

Buy early, buy often! And if you prefer the limited edition hardcover, Fairwood Press still has some available!


Meanwhile, BookView Cafe is having a December Sales Event on many of their ebooks, including my own PRACTICAL MEERKAT and the anthology BEYOND GRIMM.


And now, if you'll excuse me, my cheese food brain and I are going to drink some wine, and stare at the tv, and maybe try to read a book I didn't write....

EtA: Oh, and eat.  I should eat something more than the bowl of rice and yogurt I had for lunch, huh?

lagilman: coffee or die (citron presse)
Note to self: sleeping until 7:30 does not make you a bad person, it makes you a tired person.

(especially since you did get up at 5am when there was a crash outside - reaching for Softwing as you went, yay reflexes- and then again at 6am to feed the cats, and fell asleep again with the light on)

You're awake now, and productive (even if not by your apparently insane levels) and there's nothing wrong with anything that can't be fixed by skills you already have. Even with an hour less in the day.



Also: your irritation with Certain People does not make you a bad person, it makes you a person who has little patience for mansplanning and a particular set of Privilege.

Your willingness to tear a strip of hide from those people may make you a bad person, at least from their POV. If so, you can live with that.

Oh FFS...

Jul. 14th, 2011 09:01 am
lagilman: Does Not Play Well With Stupid People (stupid people)
from the St. Petersberg (FL) Times:


Tea party members tackle a new issue: manatees

from the 4th paragraph:

"We cannot elevate nature above people," explained Edna Mattos, 63, leader of the Citrus County Tea Party Patriots, in an interview. "That's against the Bible and the Bill of Rights."

http://www.tampabay.com/news/environment/wildlife/tea-party-members-tackle-a-new-issue-manatees/1180112


And that? That is why we mock & scorn you, Tea Partiers. You're not only idiots, you're anti-manatee.
lagilman: coffee or die (citron presse)
I have Great Plans for today. They involve incorporating my betareader's notes on "Praise the Devil" and polishing that off, getting a few thousand words written on PSI#4, putting together my editorial notes for a freelance project, invoicing finished freelance work, paying bills and printing out paperwork for the guvment (apparently I get money back from one hand and owe to the other. which is much the way guvment works, I suspect). Also, replying to pending email, laundry, making another vet appointment for Elder Cat, and ordering groceries.

The main thing, though, is the Great Plan to not actually speak to another human being, and most especially not in any way that requires me to be Up, Cheerful, and Interesting.

(the folks at the vet don't expect me to be any of these things, especially when bringing Elder Cat in again)


See... I am a classic midline introvert. I like people, a lot. I like talking to people. I like listening to people. But interacting exhausts me*. In the course of a normal day, I get to go out, interact for a handful of hours, and then retreat home to recharge (this is why I have cats. They don't ask me to be On, just There). In the course of a convention, on the other hand... the moment I leave my hotel room, I have to be ready to interact at any moment, from the hallway to the elevator to the conference floor, to the meals, etc etc. In person, with enthusiasm and real interest. And I enjoy doing it (I wouldn't be there, otherwise), but over the course of 3-5 days there is a constant drain of energy, like a leaky tub, and eventually, inevitably, I run dry.

And yeah, there is the hotel room to retreat to, but there are also obligations that keep me out of the room. Because I'm there to Interact.

And even when I think I'm home free, I'm not, really - on the shuttle to the airport, normally a time of quiet introspection, I ended up sitting with the winner of the Mr Romance contest (yes, really, RT has such a thing, and it's quite entertaining), and he and I got to talking, as one does, about travel and obligations and exhaustion...yes, I was talking about the costs of performing and related exhaustion while suffering from same and trying to avoid more of same. Very meta, I know.

So. Today, the plan is to interact to as few people as possible, and see no-one in person except maybe my neighbor, who understands that a wave is as good as a conversation, some days.

Tomorrow, I'll think about calling my mom**.

(also: no makeup. I have worn more makeup in the past week than I usually do in a month. All right, that's about one day's worth for many people, but still. I may not even brush my hair.)


*there are some folk who do not drain me, interacting. A friend in the same situation refers to them as not-people, and it is (from me, anyway) a compliment. I couldn't tell you what it is that makes them non-people, only that I know it when I'm around them. If I ever find someone who is a reverse-person, who actually recharges me, I am going to lock them in my basement and keep them forever. Except I don't have a basement. Darn.

**and The Guy. Okay, I already spoke to The Guy and will see him tomorrow. But he wouldn't be The Guy if he wasn't a not-person (see above definition).
lagilman: coffee or die (meerkat meh)
Ah, St Patrick's Day, which I celebrate by staying the hell away from anywhere people might be...anywhere people might be, basically.

Yeah, I don't know what it's like in your city, but NYC suddenly becomes the home of drunk people determined to make Jets fans look like Miss Manners' favorite cousin. Thanks but no thanks and I'll deal with everyone tomorrow when they've sobered up.

[also: corned beef? A traditional JEWISH dish that Irish immigrants to America adapted. Yes, really.)

However, if you are, y'know, Actually Irish, I wish you a Happy St Patrick's Day.


For the rest of us? one day closer to Spring. I'll raise a wee dram to that.

EtA: had a 'strami-onn-rye-widda-sour for lunch, plus a potato knish, eaten outside in the sunlight without a jacket, and now am feeling the intense desire to curl up on the sofa and sooooooze.. no, work, I meant work! PSA: when eating a proper 'strami sandwich, make sure you have hot tea handy with which to wash down the lingering grease. Trust me on this... [I had a diet coke, and had to come home and make a cup of tea for maximum digestion)
lagilman: coffee or die (brain.  hurts.)
So there is a Person on Facebook who requested to friend me. Since I didn't recognize the name, I did a basic looksee -- account seemed legit, there were no obvious warning signs (being a member of NAMBLA, FantasyWritersRTheAntiChrist, etc etc), had a number of other writers friended, so probably was a reader -- so I said yes.

the rest of the story )
lagilman: coffee or die (meerkat coffee)
This morning, while nursing a sinus headache, I looked out the window, and thought "ooo, pretty snow." And tried to create a haiku to cover it. But my brain didn't let me focus. So instead I wrote:

Soft white drops against the black / calls for a haiku / the snowplow interrupts me


Those of you being Clever may note that the structure is not 5-7-5 but rather 7-5-7. Those of you being Clever and Quick may have noted that the poem not only does not claim to be a haiku, but admits that it fails as a haiku, being self-aware of its flawed structure.

Apparently, this was Too Subtle, as I got tweets informing me I Dun It Wrong.

*sigh*
lagilman: coffee or die (truth to power)
I keep hearing people say, over and over again, that the right to free speech trumps responsibility for what we say. Even or perhaps especially if words are our tools-of-trade. I wonder how they can look themselves in the mirror - or look at their children -- after that.

You choose to exercise the right of free speech. That does not mean you're responsible for what people do with it...but you ARE responsible for influencing them. I mean, isn't that the basic idea of thanking a teacher?
lagilman: coffee or die (dandelion break)
I had wanted to come home and do a post about the opera I saw this afternoon. Instead, I am going to cuddle the CutePuppy, drink a glass of wine, & think kind, gentle, healing thoughts. Can't hurt, right?

EtA: this may be nothing politically-motivated. I find that damned unlikely, considering the threats against the Congresswoman previously, but possible. However, that does not mean we should give a free pass to the culture of violent hate espoused by national (and mainstream) political figures.

Reports are that the "target" map on the Palin website has been taken down, and her Twitter account shut down. I hope to HELL she and others of her ilk start to realize that if just as when you preach understanding and compassion, you spread that, if you call for violence and hatred... this is what you get.

Other folk have said that they don't want to hold Palin responsibile, that freedom of speech gives her the right to say whatever she wants. I agree that she has the legal right to say anything within the bounds of Freedom of Speech... but that does not absolve anyone from responsibility for those words, between them and the 3am reckoning of what they may have encouraged someone else to do.

(and yes, I consider that in my own words and writings. I have to. Fiction explores the darkness within us, but I have no desire to encourage it to grow.)


EtA2: Me: "the right to bear arms IN A WELL-REGULATED MILITIA." Okay? Can we remember that? Not the right to perform personal revenge fantasies with a goddamned automatic rifle!" My dad: "Feel better now? Me: "no!"
lagilman: coffee or die (crunchy)
I get a lot of e-mail. I get a lot of e-mail Asking For Things. And so when I get a letter asking me for help, be it as a private citizen or in my guise as Somewhat Known Author, I do three things:

1. I read it, to see if it sets off any of my "scam" alerts. That includes a misspelled or inaccurate use of my name, content that is utterly unconnected with me ("As you are a major supporter of Organization I've Never Heard Of" or mention of Christ Our Lord), or glaringly obvious misuses of the English language (yes, I know not everyone is a writer. But if you're going to write a Beg Letter, it behooves you to come across as a professional).

If it checks out, I go on to #2:

I determine if this is an organization or individual I have heard of, or have some connection that would indicate why they reached out to me (We follow your blog, and know that you share our interest in..."). Or, similarly, they are referred to me by a known third party.

If the letter clears that hurdle, or at least has reasonable justification, I go on to #3:

I enter their name and/or organization into a search browser, and see what comes up.

If, on doing #3, there is no mention in the first two pages of results, or -- on finding a website that connects to your organization but there is no mention of your name or campaign on it -- then the odds are high I'm not going to respond. And I am sure as hell not going to open any attachments you send with your email.

So if you sent me a legitimate request in the past 6 months but haven't heard back...you might want to reconsider your approach.
lagilman: Does Not Play Well With Stupid People (stupid people)
When someone asks for advice online, consider 3 things before you* speak up.

1. Do you actually know anything about the topic?
2. Is the person asking the question higher on the food chain than you are (i.e. they know more than you do on the topic, and therefore have likely already gone through everything you can think of (the "yes, I know about hard reboot, thanks anyway" scenario)
3. Has someone already suggested your solution, or a variant of it, and been told it didn't work?

Once you've done all that -- and really, it's a matter of a minute, not hours, to run through those three essentials -- and determined yes, no, and no, then and only then should you post your response...



*where "you" means "any/all of us"
lagilman: coffee or die (stop that)
Editor steals article for cookssource magazine; when writer complains says writer should be thankful: http://bit.ly/93EUqZ

You should not do this. You especially should not do this to people who know how to use social media. And you really, really should not do it where @neilhimself can comment....

Everyone repeat after me: copyright. It means that you have to get permission -- and, yes, sometimes pay -- to use someone else's work.

Anything else? Is theft. Period, end of story, no wiggle room. No, the Internet is NOT your cut-and-paste playground. And that goes for you students, too. Plagiarism will get you kicked out of any self-respecting school, and fired from any decent job.

For fuck's sake, people. Srsly?

Ahem

Oct. 5th, 2010 05:59 pm
lagilman: coffee or die (crunchy)
Those of you who agreed to read the story collection and have yet to give me feedback? Don't think you've been forgotten. No more porridge for YOU, in the future...

oh, joy.

May. 22nd, 2010 10:51 am
lagilman: coffee or die (crunchy)
Well, someone has already shown up asking for a pirated copy of "Tales of the Cosa Nostradamus" - "and they don't care what format it's in."

Guys? I'm charging, what, $4.99 for the collection? Someone really can't manage to scrape together half of a movie ticket to buy it? (more to the point, someone doesn't want to scrape together $5 to pay for it.)

And they can't even claim they're "sticking it to the publisher" here, because this is self-published, via BookViewCafe and Smashwords. No, this is just someone who feels Entitled to whatever they want, for free, and never mind that it was someone's physical and mental labor they're taking without any kind of compensation.

Sometimes, I hate people.

News flash: When you do this? You're not showing how much you like someone's work. You're showing how little you respect/value it, and them.

"Tales" was an experiment for me. if I can't even cover the hour-costs of putting it together, because of piracy? Then the experiment failed, and I won't be doing it again.

Hey, less stress and frustration and work for me. Fewer stories for you, tho.




Meanwhile, it took me about 24 hours to eat a pint of mint chocolate chip ice cream. I'm not sure if that's good, or bad... [I only let myself have ice cram when it's a) over 90 degrees or b) I'm sick, so I don't really have a decent scale for this sort of thing, but I feel like I should have taken 2 days, really...]
lagilman: coffee or die (meerkat meh)
Apparently the company that owns the mine where there was a fatal explosion in West VA today, and an unknown number are still trapped? Was previously fined to the tune of (reportedly) several million for dangerous conditions, at a different mine they owned.

I really wish I could be even slightly surprised by this. Is there any corporation anywhere that has clean hands? How about only slightly grubby?

Meanwhile, y'all have heard about this?

Constance McMillen's school is not just against gays, but also transgenders, and the learning disabled, to the point where they faked a prom so's not to have to deal with them.

Can we give that entire town a time-out until they are willing to act like rational, or at least compassionate adults instead of shit-flinging cowards? Please?


I suppose the upside is that all this pushed Tiger Woods continuing and quite boring sideshow to 5th or 6th on the rotation....
lagilman: coffee or die (naptime)
Five days of full-out writing have come to an end. I think I got a grand total of 600 words today. *is pathetic*

Okay, I did write some editorial notes, and a load of laundry, and there was a phone interview where I think I was coherent, but the brain, it is not braining well. I think... I will stare at the pretty snow still falling. And take a nap. Yes. And maybe (oh, luxury) order in something for dinner, rather than cooking. Or sleep through dinner, maybe.

Yes, I am too unbrained to cook.


Tomorrow. I will accomplish things... tomorrow.
lagilman: coffee or die (bitch)
EtA: from: @cnnbrk Kansas jury finds Scott Roeder guilty of killing of abortion doctor. http://bit.ly/catNSa

"Scott Roeder’s lawyers want jurors to consider his opposition to abortion as a valid motive for shooting George R. Tiller."

*stares*

Seriously: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/us/29roeder.html

If this is considered an acceptable defense for shooting an unarmed man -- in a house of worship, no less, in front of his family, then I move that "s/he needed killing" be returned to common usage, along with "too stupid to live." And I'm buying a gun.
lagilman: coffee or die (brain.  hurts.)
This headache is not getting any better. Plans for the day under revision.

Meanwhile, the world, it continues to make me wonder WTF?

Dear Catholic Church: Do you REALLY think that's what Jesus would say to do? Really? Not Paul -- Jesus. The guy you say was God's son? You think this is what he meant when he said "love your neighbor as yourself"?

Yesterday the Archdiocese of Washington DC threatened to cut off social services money provided by Catholic Charities to the homeless in the Capital [if marriage equality laws were passed] because the church hierarchy abhors the very idea of gay marriage.
lagilman: coffee or die (just sayin' - Nate)
For my sins (and because I really do buy into the "pay forward" theory) I've volunteered* to work with the incoming non-member queries about how to [fill in the blank] with regard to publishing/writing.

Many of the queries run along the lines of "how do I become a successful writer?" Verbatim.

*is flummoxed*

ETA: oh, I know what to tell them. I just don't understand how anyone can come in cold, asking for An Answer presumably waiting to be handed over, and if it's arrogance ("it can't be THAT hard") or stupidity ("it can't be that hard?").


I can tell someone where to go for information on agents, and manuscript formatting, and how to tell a scam from a real deal, and what questions they should ask when offered representation/a contract. I know how to, delicately, tell someone that no, we aren't a publisher and can't help them spread the word about their 2000 page epic boy-and-squirrel romantic fantasy. I'm even -- because I was an Evil Editor and have no soul to speak of -- able to dash their hopes about joining SFWA before they've made their required professional sales, no matter how bestselling their book will be some day.

But the total hopeful haplessness of some of the questions....

Do other "arts" professions get this sort of thing? Do people walk up to actors and say "how do I get a movie deal?" Do they ask painter "How do I sell my painting for a million dollars?"









* in SFWA, "volunteered" means Mary Robinette Kowal says "will you...?" in a voice that means "you WILL."

Profile

lagilman: coffee or die (Default)
Laura Anne Gilman

September 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 06:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios