lagilman: coffee or die (bitch)
I wasn't going to wade into the current WFC bruhaha (as opposed to past WFC bruhahas), because honestly this will probably continue until those who venerate Lovecraft et al over all other influences are dead, or at least out of the active field.

But look: if your idea of a celebration of world fantasy relies heavily on an old, long-dead, relevant-only-to-some-readers white male American literary figure, you're wrong. Not because you're racist or sexist, but because you're stuck in the 1970's. There has been fifty+ years of evolution in the world of fantasy the field that you're willfully blind to/ignored - more than an entire generation of readers and writers.

But hey, that in itself is not a terrible thing - everyone has their interests and if you don't want to pay attention to current trends and/or events, that's a personal choice. Just like many folk don't really care about writers who were working before 1980. But then recuse yourself from doing the programming for an event that is supposed to acknowledge ALL of the field: past, present and future. It's not that difficult: don't take on a volunteer job you know you're not qualified for or interested in.

But if you do, then getting pissy and throwing comments about "social justice warriors" (like that's something offensive) and the passive-aggressive version of "the lurkers support me in email" when many of your peers speak out against those choices? Just makes you look and sound like a badly-socialized five year old.

Nobody was impressed.
lagilman: coffee or die (the general warned me...)
Ah, the ever-present pushmepullyuou between "I shall be subtle as fuck and leave scholars to wonder at my subtlety in papers decades hence!" and "if I don't fucking spell it out in neon letters a foot high, nobody's ever going to figure out what I'm saying."


(this brought to you by the continuing frustration of an entire subset of writers everywhere hearing "we need more X in genre" and knowing that you gave them X - sometimes repeatedly - and nobody even fucking noticed because you're not a bestselling boy-writer. But never mind me, I'll just be over here, mixing up the very subtle neon ink...)

Grrrrr.

Mar. 25th, 2015 06:44 am
lagilman: coffee or die (bitch)
As irritated as I get when people owe me money (or goods or services) and are late in payment, I get even MORE annoyed, I discover, when friends are shafted. Especially when the only reason they haven't been paid is that the person owing seems to have decided that they just don't HAVE to.  And don't bother to actually talk to the person they're shafting.

(in this case, since last summer)

Look, if you promise someone payment in exchange for services? You honor your agreement. You don't just disappear off the radar and hope everyone forgets/absolves you.

Nobody forgets.
lagilman: coffee or die (the general warned me...)
"Yeah it worked there but it won't work here" is not an argument against the workability of a thing, just your particular circumstance.
lagilman: coffee or die (madness toll)
Fascinating, and rather depressing conversation happening on Twitter right now about the Great Mostly White Male "most anticipated fantasy books of 2015" lists dropping now. (the females seen on these lists? Robin Hobb and Kameron Hurley. Both potentially gender-neutral names, and Kameron says she specifically requested that they not put an author photo on the book cover).

I admit - I considered going with a male pseudonym for SILVER ON THE ROAD. I'm pretty damn sure that if I had, the book would be getting more attention, pre-pub, because the brutal truth is that male-name writers get more ink, especially but not exclusively from male reviewers. Especially if the books in question are epic (non-romantic) fantasies.  In terms of sales alone, choosing to publish under a female name is established idiocy.

And yet... this is my book. The thought of having to hide behind another name, of not being able to talk publicly about the book except through the scrim of that name, or a stand-in... to buy into the "only men write epic fantasy worth talking about" game...

Fuck that.

Hi, my name is Laura Anne Gilman, and I write some damn good epic fantasy.  And yeah, I'm female.  If that makes you shy away from a book, then you're the idiot, not me.



/vent
lagilman: coffee or die (pissed)
Warning: rant ahead, wherein I pull no punches even if I don't name names.

The most terrifying thing about reading US immigration discussions online is seeing utterly gleeful lack of compassion some people are displaying.

To those people (to everyone) I say, go read (not reread because clearly you haven't before) Emma Lazarus' inscription on the Statue of Liberty, and think about your casual 'send 'em back to be killed/ dump them off the boats' comment.

And then ask yourselves how the fuck you think your family was any better, ESPECIALLY if you can trace your family back to the original settlements, who were assuredly undocumented, uninvited, and unwanted by the original inhabitants. Nobody here, unless they're 100% Native American, did not avail themselves of an open gate. This is a country, for better or worse, built not only on immigration, but immigration based on the dream of making a better life, away from persecution and fear. Not a country so afraid that they would advocate violence against those seeking what our grandparents and great-grandparents found...

If that's your thing, you nauseate me.

And before anyone comes in to counter-rant, I'm not advocating unfettered immigration. But compassion rather than absolutism when deciding cases? Absofuckinglutely. And with at least an ATTEMPT to rein in the "but then whites will be the minority" scream you can hear rising from certain people. Maybe we will. Maybe that's not such a terrible thing. GTFOY.
lagilman: coffee or die (do I look impressed to you?)
So, Felicia Day (an actress and gamer) wrote about her own personal responses to Gamergate, how it's made her change her interactions with people (and it's a painful piece to read), while Chris Kluwe (a football player and gamer) went on a rather delightfully profane rant against the people behind Gamergate.

They went after Felicia, not Chris.

That pretty much tells you everything you need to know about the people behind the (bowel) movement of Gamergate.

Don't identify them as gamers.  Their primary affiliation is as pathetic, vicious trolls who get off on causing harm.
lagilman: coffee or die (stop that)
People in various social media are throwing words like “mentally ill” around, with the regard to the UCSB killings, making it a singular (dismissible) issue, rather than addressing the underlying social issues of WHY he went after those women. They're saying "oh but" and "Actually," and generally trying to talk over the real problem:

that this isn't the first time a man has killed a woman for saying no. It's not even the first (second, third, tenth) time a man has killed women he didn't know, because another woman said no.  Was the shooter mentally ill?  Generally, mentally healthy people don't go on shooting rampages.  But every time you say "well, he was ill" you're also saying "not my fault, not my responsibility, not my problem."

Except it's every woman's problem.  So your dismissal is a dismissal of our right to safety.

Yeah, I get it: it’s easier to say “the guy was mentally ill” rather than face the real issue. The real issue makes a lot of men uncomfortable (see: "not all men"). Guess what? We don’t care if the discussion makes you uncomfortable. No woman should be afraid to say no. No-one should die because a man couldn’t handle “no.”

If violence against women is a sign of mental illness, then this world has an epidemic. And it needs to be treated. Now. Better: yesterday.
lagilman: coffee or die (peevy short chick)
It's been a very, very long time since I was as angry at someone as I am right now.

Literally, wordless and shaking with anger. Blast-level anger of the sort that doesn't fade after I've had time to rant it off.

Because yes, I hold certain standards for people I call friend, and the first is that you don't blame someone else for your own fuckups, and the second that you don't EVER use professional standing to threaten someone over a personal matter. Ever.

No, I'm not going to name names.  They know. Just consider this a bankable warning: I have a very long fuse, but once it goes off, there is no going back or unsparking it.
lagilman: coffee or die (do I look impressed to you?)
I'm sorry, everyone, but an otherwise peaceful Monday has been interrupted by asshattery, and I need to rant (without giving specifics, so if you don't already know what set this off, you probably won't care...).

FFS, people... )
lagilman: coffee or die (citron presse)
This morning's brief-but-fierce thunderstorm has done its job: it's no cooler out there, but much steamier. Ugh. The Transformer Office has been relocated to directly in front of the AC, along with the cats. I have deadlines that wait for no weather front. :-( On the plus side, Transformer Office can handle it.

Working on the revisions to HEART OF BRIAR and the draft of MILES TO GO. A day spent writing is a good day, no matter what else happens. I keep reminding myself of this...

Spent much of yesterday reading the SCOTUS decision on the Affordable Care Act, and the fallout therein (including Rand Paul's OMGWTF exposure of his own stupidity OMGWTF?). Am somewhat disgusted that so many people are focusing on the "oh noes they're MAKING ME GET INSURANCE!" aspect of the law and ignoring all the many other very important bits that improve the health care situation for much of the population. It's reminding me much of all the "YOU CAN'T TELL ME TO WEAR A SEAT BELT!' complaints I heard when those laws were pushed through. Dude, put on your seat belt, prepare for eventualities, and read the actual law already, okay?

Toward that, I give you this:

http://artinfo.com/news/story/811251/how-artists-will-be-affected-by-the-supreme-courts-decision-to-uphold-obamas-affordable-care-act

"Under the ACA, states will set up group exchanges by 2014, which will.... allow individuals and small businesses to band together to form groups, just like if they were part of a large corporation. The exchanges will not be able to consider pre-existing conditions when creating groups — currently one of the biggest reasons why individuals or small businesses have a hard time getting affordable insurance."

In other words, folks: the ACA is the reason why I don't live in fear of ending up in the hospital and having my life savings wiped out by medical costs - because the Freelancer's Union was able to set up exactly that. And if you work for a small company that doesn't offer health benefits, or are self-employed and can't afford insurance, the ACA could change that*.

Yeah, I think this is better than what we had before. You're not going to convince me otherwise, no matter how much you say "oh noes the taxes! oh noes the loss-of-my-freedoms!" Dudes, the Patriot Act was a loss of freedoms. This is just a reminder to be a fucking responsible adult. IMGDO.

*Catastrophic, to cover your ass, or more as your situation required. And if you want "Cadillac" insurance, you can pay more for that, too. Market options. not perfect, but yeah again...better.
lagilman: coffee or die (bored now)
At RT, I was given a sampling of books, including a trio by Louisa Edwards, who has excellent reviews and buzz, and they're romances set in the restaurant industry so hey, right up my alley, right?

I read the 2nd in the series (original post edited for clarity) and found it cute but with depth and interest. The first one tells a story that's already closed in book 2, so I decided to move on to book 3.

The heroine is a prodigy. Okay, check. She's a described geek. Okay, check. She's a fannish geek. Okay, check and yay! Oh. Wait.

Does anyone here know an adult, professional geek who would be so totally unaware of the (established in the book for students and faculty alike) sternly demanded-on dress code of their new job that they'd show up in khakis and a Star Wars t-shirt? One of her stated "favorite Star Wars t-shirts?"

Okay yeah, maybe we all know one or three who manage to survive past 16. I cringed but I let it go. It's no way to establish your character as being either competent or sympathetic but it's easy shorthand (except that in the next chapter it's established that she'd read the entire school handbook and memorized it so...no. She couldn't have missed that fact), and hey it was just the first appearance and...

and does anyone here know an adult, professional woman who - seriously, with no irony - says things like "what in the name of Joss are you doing here?" or "For Buffy's sake?"

At this point [ETA: please note here, before you comment, that it was not simply the dress code thing that pissed me off, but the entire characterization], it became clear to me that either the author had never actually met an adult female media fan, or bothered to talk to any of them, because the entire character, from her appearance to her smart-but-incompetent performances to her geeky-squeaky brains to her utter cluelessness about any relationships, was out of the Cliche Handbook.

Sorry, Ms. Edwards: you lost me by p. 32.
lagilman: coffee or die (pissed)
Having just overhead a conversation walking back from lunch, I have to vent.

Gentlemen? Considering the emotional investment and physical self-worth y'all seem to have wrapped up in the size of your sexual organ, how much money seems to be spent in the hopes of enlarging it a single inch, and how hurt you are if even the slightest hint is made that it may on the small side? If you then turn around and make comments about a woman's sexuality based on the size of her breasts*, that makes you utter and total shitweasels.

Thrice that if the subject of your comments is the teenaged girl walking not ten steps ahead of you, well within hearing range.

I have spent the past 40 years learning to control my temper. But this afternoon one gentleman just came within the count of ten of getting his head handed to him. And I don't mean verbally.



*Yes, everyone has different preferences. This is about not being a shitweasel. And don't give me that "men are visual" crap, either. What you respond to sexually and what words come out of your mouth are NOT inextricably linked (and if they are, do us all a favor and stay in your cave. Nobody - not male nor female -- is impressed.)
lagilman: coffee or die (brain.  hurts.)
So this came up on my Twitterfeed:

RT @mightymur THIS IS WHY YOU READ BORING LEGAL CRAP (esp. in writing contests!) http://bit.ly/e2kiHa (read clause 13.

And so, of course, I went and looked.

DISCLAIMER: AT LEAST ONE PERSON AFFILIATED WITH THIS IS SOMEONE I HAVE WORKED WITH IN MY PREVIOUS CAREER. I HAVE NO REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE IN ANY WAY RUNNING A SCAM. THAT SAID....PROCEED WITH CAUTION.

this got a little long )
lagilman: coffee or die (dandelion break)
I had wanted to come home and do a post about the opera I saw this afternoon. Instead, I am going to cuddle the CutePuppy, drink a glass of wine, & think kind, gentle, healing thoughts. Can't hurt, right?

EtA: this may be nothing politically-motivated. I find that damned unlikely, considering the threats against the Congresswoman previously, but possible. However, that does not mean we should give a free pass to the culture of violent hate espoused by national (and mainstream) political figures.

Reports are that the "target" map on the Palin website has been taken down, and her Twitter account shut down. I hope to HELL she and others of her ilk start to realize that if just as when you preach understanding and compassion, you spread that, if you call for violence and hatred... this is what you get.

Other folk have said that they don't want to hold Palin responsibile, that freedom of speech gives her the right to say whatever she wants. I agree that she has the legal right to say anything within the bounds of Freedom of Speech... but that does not absolve anyone from responsibility for those words, between them and the 3am reckoning of what they may have encouraged someone else to do.

(and yes, I consider that in my own words and writings. I have to. Fiction explores the darkness within us, but I have no desire to encourage it to grow.)


EtA2: Me: "the right to bear arms IN A WELL-REGULATED MILITIA." Okay? Can we remember that? Not the right to perform personal revenge fantasies with a goddamned automatic rifle!" My dad: "Feel better now? Me: "no!"
lagilman: coffee or die (just sayin' - Nate)
My name is not that difficult. Really. Especially if you're typing it, rather than saying it out loud.

Do I abbreviate your name? No I don't, not without permission and/or a certain level of familiarity. And if you say "My name is X," then I call you X. I don't decide you meant "My name is really Y."

How be-damned hard is it? Seriously?
lagilman: coffee or die (stop that)
Another rant (this one about the tone and 'tude of pirate sites being snarky about how they will deign to honor a legal takedown notice, threatening legitimate copyright holders, and disclaiming Oh No WE don't host anything illegal HERE!) written up, stared at, and deleted.


Y'know, as I've said before, if you're going to do something illegal, then do it. Don't pretend to honor the law or give a fuck about other peoples' rights when clearly you don't. If you upload/host illegally-procured files, then you're a selfish bastard who enjoys stealing and enabling other people to steal. Own your selfishness, already.




[if you download illegal files, all legalities aside, beware of viruses that might be embedded in those files because come on, you're trusting someone who has already proven they hack to show off/screw with other people...)
lagilman: coffee or die (stop that)
Everyone knows that uploading illegal files is bad, right? That taking copyrighted files, things protected by law, is stealing, the same as if you'd taken the contents right out of the store without paying? And that if you download that file, you're in receipt of stolen property?

And that in doing so, you're hurting the chances of your alleged favorite writers/musicians/etc ever creating new material for you, because our contracts will be dropped for poor sales?

Right.

Then you should also know that a disclaimer like this:

To uploaders: You may not use this site to distribute any material when you do not have the legal rights to do so. It is your own responsibility to adhere to these terms. To downloaders: Contents shared by this site's users are only for evaluation and tryout, you'd better delete them in 24 hours after evaluation. If you like them, please purchase the copyright version.

is bullshit. Especially when it appears on a site that is filled with nothing but overtly illegal downloads*.

Why the HELL can people not take accountability? If you're going to host a site that is obviously there to exchange pirated files, don't bullshit about it. Be a goddamn pirate. Cry argh and dare the authorities to catch you, don't hide behind "oh but it's not ME doing it!" or promises to take it down if someone nails you to the wall.

If you're legit? Police your own gateway, and save yourself the time/energy of having to deal with takedown notices. Seriously, you'll come out ahead. And if you want to be a pirate (or pirate host) but don't have the cojones/ovaries to stand tall under your flag of piracy?

DON'T DO IT.


And to everyone out there who wants to read my books but can't afford them, and can't get to a library that has a copy/borrow from a friend? My offer still stands: send me an email and tell me what you're looking for and why you can't get hold of it. I'd rather GIVE you a copy than have copyright pirates get satisfaction.







*the only folk with the right to post "evaluation" material are those authorized by the copyright holder. In most cases that is a) the publisher and b) a legit retailer like Amazon or BN.com. Plus, of course, the author's own website.

*headdesk*

Sep. 13th, 2010 12:47 pm
lagilman: Does Not Play Well With Stupid People (stupid people)
Oh I have this rant i want to do about the apparent illiteracy of an entire generation, but I have neither time nor energy so I will simply say incIdent, people. TruLY. PleASUre. This is your language. Learn how to use it, please.


[illiteracy is not txtspk. Txtspk presumes knowledge to alter.]
lagilman: coffee or die (peevy short chick)
under the heading of "arrogant," subheading, "weasily little shit."

"...There are 1410 authors, and maybe 15,000-20,000 works (duplicate formats exist for many, most being .pdf). Needless to say countless hours were put into this project (and many more could be), so I hope you like it and will help seed it."

I can't speak to all 20,000 works being pirated, but the ones of mine that person has oh so graciously uploaded sure as hell are.

(s/he was quite upfront about the fact that "(one bloody collection took hours to unpack!$%#)" Apparently s/he never stopped to think that what s/he was doing was, y'know... wrong. In both the moral and legal sense. Or just doesn't give a fuck.)

Stupid little arrogant fuckass. Would like to see how s/he would feel about me taking a portion of his/her paycheck because I waaaaaanted it.

And, of course, to actually get the host to take it down they require you to jump through so many hoops, including registering and tracking down every single file you claim, that I'd lose an entire day just to doing that*. Aren't they so clever and cute and oh no they're not doing ANYTHING wrong, they're in utter compliance with the bare letter of the law....

Again I say, if you download bootleg or pirated materials, you're not "putting it to the publishing companies." You're hurting the writers whose work you claim to enjoy, and making it less likely that there will be any more work from that author. Pirated copies = fewer legal sales = less income for the author = finding some other way to make a living.

So steal if you must. But for fuck's sake don't make like you're doing it for anything other than greedy little selfish get-a-kick-out-of-stealing reasons.

*takes a deep breath, exhales*



*I really need an intern, who will file and go to the post awful, and send DMCA letters for me... anyone want to volunteer? I could pay a small commuting stipend, and chocolate chip cookies...

Profile

lagilman: coffee or die (Default)
Laura Anne Gilman

September 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 01:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios