EtA: from: @cnnbrk Kansas jury finds Scott Roeder guilty of killing of abortion doctor. http://bit.ly/catNSa
"Scott Roeder’s lawyers want jurors to consider his opposition to abortion as a valid motive for shooting George R. Tiller."
*stares*
Seriously: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/us/29roeder.html
If this is considered an acceptable defense for shooting an unarmed man -- in a house of worship, no less, in front of his family, then I move that "s/he needed killing" be returned to common usage, along with "too stupid to live." And I'm buying a gun.
"Scott Roeder’s lawyers want jurors to consider his opposition to abortion as a valid motive for shooting George R. Tiller."
*stares*
Seriously: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/us/29roeder.html
If this is considered an acceptable defense for shooting an unarmed man -- in a house of worship, no less, in front of his family, then I move that "s/he needed killing" be returned to common usage, along with "too stupid to live." And I'm buying a gun.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 01:07 am (UTC)As for the "house of worship" part - you are aware that there is a large contingent of people who claim that it wasn't "really" a church, based on the fact that it accepted Dr. Tiller and his family? I've seen articles about someone whining that he just went there to preach the Bible, and if it was a real church, it would have been happy to let him come in off the street and witness instead of the minister having his ass thrown out.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 01:29 am (UTC)Thankfully.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 02:21 pm (UTC)If won't work if the prosecutors are doing their job.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 01:44 am (UTC)I wonder if this is a de facto guilty plea. Even if he's using it to plead not guilty.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 02:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 02:28 am (UTC)We can hope that the 'defense' will annoy everyone enough that they render an extreme verdict, rather than a weaker one.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 05:58 am (UTC)http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/83274.html
for a dumbed-down summary that misses the main procedural point.)
In this instance, it looks like Judge Wilbert had a hidden agenda, however procedurally misguided: He gave Roeder enough rope to hang himself. He still gave the maroon a platform to turn it into a show trial... just like many object will happen if we actually give GITMO detainees trials under civilian rules. My irony meter is pretty well pegged.
-- Jaws
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 02:43 am (UTC)Gotta love the logic.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 01:46 am (UTC)But we do an export trade in Maine.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 02:12 am (UTC)There are times I want the "stupid people shouldn't breed" shirt. This would be one of those times.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 03:25 am (UTC)The attorney has given up, right? And is now allowing the bastard to call the shots, just in case the jury has somebody on it that will agree with him?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 07:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 01:48 pm (UTC)People in general suck.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 04:27 pm (UTC)I despise murderers who tack "moral" arguments onto their motives - it's doubly worse than murder alone because it tends to paint everbody who really does believe that "X is wrong" as trigger-happy lunatics. The obvious fact is that he's a murderer, he intended to murder, he was not provoked or defending himself or anyone else, and he stalked the doctor and shot him in cold blood. He's a psychopath who thought he could get away with killing someone just because that person had a controversial profession. It's amazing there are lawyers who will even touch this.
I don't like abortion, but Dr. Tiller did not deserve to die. You don't kill people to solve social problems, and it's ridiculous to imagine that this is supposed to a defense. This is the arrogance of a pyschopath spewing his warped worldview as soon as he has an audience.
I also despise churches that are more caught up in maintaining the exclusivity of their little saints' clubs than in serving and saving people who need help. This is not the way to win people over or even to coexist with a secular world. It's not even a good plan for long-term survival - churches die once they turn into havens for hypocrites. So, there's no reason to suppose that Dr. Tiller's church wasn't really a church, and every reason to think that the snipers who are saying that are hypocrites themselves. So that's my 2 cents on the religious aspect.
Something about these two phenomena seems related somehow. Inability to see hypocrisy in self? Playing God to decide who is worthy of living? Just plain evil and perversity?
Hmmm... doing a lot of despising today. I need to calm down or I'll never get any sleep tonight.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 06:52 pm (UTC)http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/30/us/30roeder.html?hp
What I want to know is: Why isn't someone like this charged with terrorism as well? If The Scurry Moozlim Funduhmentalists get extra charges piled on top of murder or whatnot b/c they are trying to terrorize/make a political point, why not this scumbucket?
no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 06:55 pm (UTC)(and yeah, I updated my post when the news came in)
no subject
Date: 2010-01-30 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-29 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-30 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 05:01 am (UTC)Some people are Just No Damned Good.