my line in the sand
Nov. 9th, 2009 02:27 pm"I acknowledge that the gains we have made with the health care plan are a strong and valid first step towards reclaiming our place as a First World nation. However, as a woman who believes nobody has the right to take away my freedom of choice, the Stupak amendment is not acceptable.
And I say to those who tell me to wait, that it will be overturned, that I do NOT trust in the same organizations that said this was acceptable to reverse it later. Blind faith in anyone can get you killed -- be it by a bullet, or a wire hanger."
And I say to those who tell me to wait, that it will be overturned, that I do NOT trust in the same organizations that said this was acceptable to reverse it later. Blind faith in anyone can get you killed -- be it by a bullet, or a wire hanger."
no subject
Date: 2009-11-09 07:41 pm (UTC)I don't have great hope that Congress will correct this. I do have expectations that women will band together in some way to insure funding for those who need but cannot afford abortions.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-09 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-09 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-09 09:03 pm (UTC)But nor will I stand by quietly and let someone tell e what I may and may not do with my body, based on their religious or socioeconomic faith. I'm just not going to rant or rage about it any more. This is where I stand.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-09 09:19 pm (UTC)To me, anything less than single-payer with no restrictions is unacceptable. I realize that is an unrealistic utopian ideal, but I still feel very strongly about this. The bill that was passed in the House over the weekend is an epic failure, and not just the Stupak amendment, but the entire bill is totally unacceptable.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-10 03:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-14 12:52 am (UTC)Rep. Stupak, Rep. Lynch, etc., need replacing--along with 99% of the Gruesome Offal Party members in Congress.