oh bugger that for a lark....
May. 30th, 2007 08:57 pmHave you heard about the New Rules According to Six Apart's Morality Police?
"Thousands of LiveJournal customers are rebelling against the company's recent decision to censor hundreds of sex-themed discussion groups, a broad swath that has led to the removal of literary critiques and fan-written fiction about Harry Potter.
LiveJournal, which is owned by San Francisco-based Six Apart, confirmed Wednesday that it deleted around 500 journals this week in hopes of better "protecting children." It said the deletion was prompted by activist groups, including one called Warriors for Innocence that claims to track sites promoting pedophilia, the sexual abuse of minors, and other illegal activities."
The article then goes on to point out that
"Legal experts say LiveJournal is clearly not liable for fictional stories and related discussions posted by its users, thanks to a 1996 federal law immunizing Web-based discussion forums from lawsuits. 'If the content is otherwise legal, then LiveJournal has no obligation to police its site or remove any legal content it finds,' said Eric Goldman, who teaches at the Santa Clara University School of Law. "
(emphasis mine)
EtA: mind you, if something crosses the boundries into illegality, I agree it should go. But using a broadsword instead of a scalpel just proves you're a moron, and defending the broadsword means you're a moron without a PR person.
etA2: this post hasn't been verified yet, but it suggests that the so-called "Warriors For Innocence" have ties to several radical and extremely racists 'Christian militia" groups. You know, the kind that say if you're anything other than Them, you're a god-hating, child-abusing, liberal-voting, devil-worshiping....
hey. Has anyone told this group that LJ's mascot is a goat? And that they're based in San Francisco?
Anyone else really tempted to list "highly sexualized goat-pr0n" as an interest, to see how long it takes to get their account deleted as being "bad for the CHILdren?"
I'm not going to jump ship just yet -- I'm digging in and fighting back the only way I know how -- with words here, and a hit to their wallet there. I encourage everyone else to do the same. Leaving just makes these anally troubled organizations think they've taken the field without resistence. Hell no, I won't go. And if it takes posting explicit pr0n to this journal to make a point, well, my family's always been a big fan of civil disobedience....
"Thousands of LiveJournal customers are rebelling against the company's recent decision to censor hundreds of sex-themed discussion groups, a broad swath that has led to the removal of literary critiques and fan-written fiction about Harry Potter.
LiveJournal, which is owned by San Francisco-based Six Apart, confirmed Wednesday that it deleted around 500 journals this week in hopes of better "protecting children." It said the deletion was prompted by activist groups, including one called Warriors for Innocence that claims to track sites promoting pedophilia, the sexual abuse of minors, and other illegal activities."
The article then goes on to point out that
"Legal experts say LiveJournal is clearly not liable for fictional stories and related discussions posted by its users, thanks to a 1996 federal law immunizing Web-based discussion forums from lawsuits. 'If the content is otherwise legal, then LiveJournal has no obligation to police its site or remove any legal content it finds,' said Eric Goldman, who teaches at the Santa Clara University School of Law. "
(emphasis mine)
EtA: mind you, if something crosses the boundries into illegality, I agree it should go. But using a broadsword instead of a scalpel just proves you're a moron, and defending the broadsword means you're a moron without a PR person.
etA2: this post hasn't been verified yet, but it suggests that the so-called "Warriors For Innocence" have ties to several radical and extremely racists 'Christian militia" groups. You know, the kind that say if you're anything other than Them, you're a god-hating, child-abusing, liberal-voting, devil-worshiping....
hey. Has anyone told this group that LJ's mascot is a goat? And that they're based in San Francisco?
Anyone else really tempted to list "highly sexualized goat-pr0n" as an interest, to see how long it takes to get their account deleted as being "bad for the CHILdren?"
I'm not going to jump ship just yet -- I'm digging in and fighting back the only way I know how -- with words here, and a hit to their wallet there. I encourage everyone else to do the same. Leaving just makes these anally troubled organizations think they've taken the field without resistence. Hell no, I won't go. And if it takes posting explicit pr0n to this journal to make a point, well, my family's always been a big fan of civil disobedience....
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:08 am (UTC):::Pumps fist in air::::
Let them take two of us on.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:15 am (UTC)Precisely, and only makes them think that they'll be successful as they hunt everyone down to the *next* place. Better to stay and ride it out, and to remind SixApart of the egg that ended up all over AOL's face when they banned dirty words and got ridiculed for banning breast cancer survivor and breast feeding journals.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 10:34 am (UTC)But I see a difference between banning images and banning whole communities. One moderately limits self-expression; the other entirely shuts it down.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:19 am (UTC)I'm livid at the stupid CEO. And yes, VERY tempted to list a few highly-flavoured things - including "beating Warriors of Innocence to death with a rock" - as interests.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:19 am (UTC)Since Lolita has been deemed to dangerous fore the children, anyone up for a robust disscussion of de Sade?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:25 am (UTC)I'd join that comm, just to have it on my f-list.
what I really want is to come up with a perfectly reasonable interest that will trigger their broadsword, and have a mass listing of it. See if we can get, oh, a hundred, two hundred people all listing it at the same time....
*hums a bar of 'Alice's Restaurant'*
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:34 am (UTC)What shall we call it?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:38 am (UTC)I feel like blasting Queen's "Tie Your Mother Down" at warp eleven. Or plugging in one of my guitars and playing my own version.
GOD, I am furious.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:56 am (UTC)There's a Brian May song for all occasions. Truth.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:58 am (UTC)Damn it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:12 am (UTC)But there's no incest in that one. Justine's got incest, IIRC.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:21 am (UTC)I'd have to look it up as to where it was again.
Then we also have 'The New Story of O', which features implied incest, rape, underage sex, etc.
Of course, there's also Anne Rice's Beauty series....
Various Victorian Erotica aka 'bodice rippers'....
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 03:31 am (UTC)Or Mallory's Le Morte d'Arthur? Or Mann's Death in Venice? Or almost any of Anne Perry's Pitt mysteries. It's everywhere!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 10:27 am (UTC)Ew, really?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 11:16 am (UTC)Then she made up the Inner Circle and fell in love with her own creation (a bad habit of hers, it would seem) and it became so omnipresent, I stopped reading them.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:31 am (UTC)I'm not searching for it - I'd probably find it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:04 am (UTC)My thoughts exactly.
Mind you, I do have journals elsewhere, if they decide to ban me, perchance.}:P
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 04:26 am (UTC)if I suddenly go bye-bye...
Date: 2007-05-31 11:29 am (UTC)I must have had an inkling...
(mind you, I've not been happy with sixApart since the whole "corporate accounts" thing.... I saw where the wind was blowing, which was 'screw the people who built us, we want Corporate Money and are willing to whore you out for it."
Not that there's anything wrong with corporate money, if you wash it in good deeds and bleach. But there's got to be a balance!)
Re: if I suddenly go bye-bye...
Date: 2007-05-31 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 05:46 pm (UTC)