Not a Rant[tm}
Nov. 30th, 2005 06:43 amIn
kradical's journal, he went on a semi-rant about the (ab)use of "i" and "e" in front of everything.
Me, I'm still stuck on the fact that it's now considered acceptable usage to say email instead of e-mail. Not by me, it isn't, she said, brandishing her (wooden) cane and chomping her (ivory) fake teeth....
I blame text messaging. Lord knows I abuse texting as much as the next non-teenaged non-geek (my cell phone bill proves that) but it takes me the same amount of time to type the full word in as it does to enter some stupid semi-abbreviated code. Using "U" instead of "you" or similar silliness while corresponding with me? Some folk have already learned that this is...dangerous. To say the least.
If I'm worth the time to talk to, I'm worth the effort of a complete word. Except 'k. At this point, I've caved on the use of 'k. But I feel slightly dirty for it.
On that topic, I have come up with a new technological breakthrough that will make me famous, if not rich. It's an attachment to your iPod that allows you to interact with other people, exchange ideas, and put forward propositions into a group.
It's called an iThink.
In stores by next December. Start saving your pennies now.
Me, I'm still stuck on the fact that it's now considered acceptable usage to say email instead of e-mail. Not by me, it isn't, she said, brandishing her (wooden) cane and chomping her (ivory) fake teeth....
I blame text messaging. Lord knows I abuse texting as much as the next non-teenaged non-geek (my cell phone bill proves that) but it takes me the same amount of time to type the full word in as it does to enter some stupid semi-abbreviated code. Using "U" instead of "you" or similar silliness while corresponding with me? Some folk have already learned that this is...dangerous. To say the least.
If I'm worth the time to talk to, I'm worth the effort of a complete word. Except 'k. At this point, I've caved on the use of 'k. But I feel slightly dirty for it.
On that topic, I have come up with a new technological breakthrough that will make me famous, if not rich. It's an attachment to your iPod that allows you to interact with other people, exchange ideas, and put forward propositions into a group.
It's called an iThink.
In stores by next December. Start saving your pennies now.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 12:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 12:58 pm (UTC)Make room on the curmudgeon bench. I even capitalize and punctuate properly when I IM, too. I don't hold it against people who don't, (I know some of my friends try to (I know for some friends it's a matter of minimizing typing time for hand issues) although I do twitch, just a bit.
But all in all, it makes me crazy, crazy, crazy.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 12:59 pm (UTC)One would ordinarily expect "e-mail" to complete the compounding process and become a single word, but I suspect it will remain hyphenated because the "em" is so likely to be mispronounced. Still, it could happen. We certainly don't spell "to-day" with a hyphen anymore, despite the "tod" leading one to suspect a short "o" sound. :-)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 01:33 pm (UTC)I won't go into full rant mode but I used to teach a social skills class for kids with behavior disorders. They often got into trouble because they didn't know how to switch their speech for peers and for authority figures. You talk to your buds one way and your teacher another. I'm noticing that talking to adults as if they were another kid is becoming the norm. It's a subtle difference but one, up until recently, young people without a disability use to pick up on without direct instruction. Okay, I'm ranting and will stop.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 04:37 pm (UTC)Admittedly, I'm not a teacher (though I am a Scout leader), which may make a difference. It would be a little odd to call a teacher by first name right off the bat.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 02:35 pm (UTC)The other pet peeve is "utilize" instead of use, although that battle is a rearguard action at this point.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 06:22 pm (UTC)iAgree
Date: 2005-11-30 03:14 pm (UTC)Austin (about to be 8) does not have an e-mail account, and will not get one until next school year at the earliest.
Sean
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 04:40 pm (UTC)email looks better/less awkward to my eye than e-mail, so I don't much mind the change as the latter becomes standard.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-30 08:32 pm (UTC)typical sentance structure was to ignore capitals
we also tended to ignore punctuation
but damn it! we at least used real words!
In the mid 90's I became part of the game staff, and in order to maintain the illusion that many of the things we did came from the game, I got into the habit of complete sentance structure. (Even if the spelling wasn't always perfect)
In the late 90's I started playing a new game and suddenly got hit with all these younger players using shorthand. Using c for see, 4 for for, u for you. I hated it. Annoyed the crap out of me. Look I can read typo, but plez dont make me try to figer out wat ur tryn to say. (twitch) I developed this stuck up reputation because I was the only one running around typing in complete sentences. I still do it when online. The only thing I find worse is the guy who can't write complete thoughts in a coherent pattern.
There was this guy on a distro list I was on for awhile that would use poor grammer, bad spelling, incomplete sentences and no logical thought progression in his messages. Everything had to be decyphered, and he wondered why no one paid attention to him. I tried to tell him that he needed to put more thought into his messages, that people found reading his posts to be a tiresome choir so we all just ignored him. He never did seem to figure out that reading is supposed to be a joy, not a job. *shrug*