crash & burn

[lagilman]

As suspected in my last post, the good mood didn't last. I have, in parlance, crashed and burned. And not even cookies and cream chocolates are making a dent... okay, they're making a small dent in the mood.

I may be the only person in the world who hates Fridays. Don't ask.

But I did manage to get another chunk of the YA project done last night, ending when I realized I'd swerved off-plot and would have to decide if I wanted to retrace or plow forward on this new direction. Also realized it was after midnight, so I went to bed instead.


My life is so unbelievably boring. I should make something up to entertain y'all.

Comments

Re: of mice and men...

[msagara.livejournal.com]

The letting go of the outline? That's the part I really, really couldn't do -- once it was on paper, I just -choked- for a month. And given deadlines? That was a special form of near-suicide *wry g*.

Another author told me just to send them my synopsis, cleaned up, and I had to admit that I don't have one. And CJ Cherryh, when she was in Toronto for a con, told me how to write an outline -- and it was exactly what I would normally do; describe the background situation, and a bit of the characters and their motivations, but no more. As in, no plot.

Which doesn't really work, at least for my agent *wry g*.

When you were doing more editing, how many of your writers did plot outlines (the standard 10-12 page ones that seem to be what's required)?

Re: of mice and men... (class is in session)

[lagilman]

When you were doing more editing, how many of your writers did plot outlines (the standard 10-12 page ones that seem to be what's required)?


Um.... Some did, some didn't. Some told me what the story was about, some gave me chapter by chapter breakdowns. And in at least once case, a writer I had worked with for umpteen books told me over the phone what the story was about and I typed up a synopsis so we'd have something in file to satisfy the contract payment requirements.

Some writers needed to have an outline, so they didn't go too far insane. Others, I could trust to go their merry way and I'll see you in six or nine or twelve months when it's done. So long as the author and I were both on the same page about what sort of book was going to be handed in, everything was cool.

Want to know a secret? The outline is required for three reasons.

1. so art and copy have something tow ork with when the manuscript isn't available (an sometimes even when it is, if you have a lazy art or copy department, so it helps to send an updated synopsis when things change significantly).
2. So that they can hang a payment on something being delivered (thereby stretching out the delivery times, and I can't blame them, but that may be another post entirely, someone remind me later).
3. So that, in case the writer screws up magnificently, or the publisher is going down in flames, there's a wy later on to say "hey, we bought it off X and you delivered Y and no, we won't accept that we want X." That's the one most authors fear, but it's also the one most rarely put into play. I've certainly never done it, although I had to threaten once or twice to get the revisions that were needed.