taken completely out of context...

[lagilman]

and without incriminating anyone:

Person 1: "The REAL question is, how much would you girls be willing to PAY to see a nude wrestling match between Hugh Jackman and Neil Gaiman? I sense business opportunities here!"

Person 2: "Hell, make it a tag-team match -- Neil Gaiman & Taye Diggs v. Hugh Jackman and Viggo Mortensen -- and *I'll* buy a ticket."


*digs into wallet* Me too!

Comments

[scarlettina.livejournal.com]

Me three!

[vincam.livejournal.com]

Oh, my. Oh....::cough:: my...

[bhadrasvapna.livejournal.com]

Does that even need context?

[e-booklover.livejournal.com]

I'm willing to wait in line for a ticket :D

[mizkit.livejournal.com]

...actually, I think I'd be happiest if you took Neil out of the equation. I'm pretty sure he's not as ripped as the rest of them... :)

[lauriemann.livejournal.com]

Maybe not, but he's got the best hair!

[lagilman]

well, the conversation started out of the tor.com AFD post about finding a single woman in the world who didn't think Neil was sexy, so he's there by default. *grin*

[mizkit.livejournal.com]

*laughs* Fair enough. :)

[dianora2.livejournal.com]

finding a single woman in the world who didn't think Neil was sexy

*raises hand*

[lagilman]

Yeah, that was my take, too. Nice guy, great writer, but meh on the sexy. That's when Hugh was brought in....

[mevennen.livejournal.com]

Whilst I am very fond of Mr Gaiman...

[dianora2.livejournal.com]

I do commend Hugh as an excellent replacement.

[kateelliott.livejournal.com]

I'm with you. I'm just not that into him!

Hugh and Taye, now. Yum. Viggo's all right, too.

[mizkit.livejournal.com]

Viggo's okay. Aragorn is hot, but Viggo's only okay.

Apparently you and I should get together and drool over guys. We seem to have similar tastes. :)

[kateelliott.livejournal.com]

We could have, like, a rating session!

[mizkit.livejournal.com]

Bwahahah. THat sounds fun. :)

[vampry.livejournal.com]

Oh, honey. Have you seen Viggo naked? Like in "Eastern Promises"? He's hot.

[jperceval.livejournal.com]

How much are tickets? *g*

[mt-yvr.livejournal.com]

The rest of them do fine... Neil... well I'd just giggle. I can't help it, after ages of Esther telling wonderful stories/descriptions of him... I just can't NOT giggle.

:P

[booraven22.livejournal.com]

O_O
Sorry. My undies just went up in flames on part one so part two was unnecessary.

::Starts seeing what she has available on her credit cards::

[sacredmime.livejournal.com]

Tomcatfight!!

[wedschilde.livejournal.com]

:::raises hand:::: well... for me on the pervie level....

neil gaiman and peter wingfield

hugh jackman and josh holloway

[mizkit.livejournal.com]

Yes, yes, i'd wanted to throw Peter into the mix, too. Althogh I'd ahve been replacing Neil, probably. Unless it was being judged by voices, in which case I think actually Hugh loses out. Well, unless he's singing, which--oh, nevermind, this is getting complicated. :)

[lagilman]

Having seen Hugh on Broadway, he stays on my list.

Sings, dances, cracks jokes, and strips down well. Um, yeah. I appreciate a multi-talented performer.

[mizkit.livejournal.com]

Oh yes. I've seen him live, too. Om nom nom.

[wedschilde.livejournal.com]

see? so very complicated! i think we need to do a mix and match until we're certain of the pairs that we decide on. perhaps a long appraisal time? :::nods:::

All Hail The Nose!

[lagilman]

I'm still annoyed they did "The Raven" or whatever instead of the Joe and Methos Show. Just the two of them sitting around in a bar. Drinking beer. Occasionally singing and playing guitar. Maybe sometimes working on fight moves. I'd have watched that!

Re: All Hail The Nose!

[wedschilde.livejournal.com]

i fully agree. i am much miffed about that. really. i mean i wholly support that show... even now. i'd still pay to see the joe and methos show.

hell, i think they should even allow for fans to be guests as audience members :D

[barbhendee.livejournal.com]

Oh . . . I like Peter Wingfield. That man looks soooooo good in a cableknit sweater.

[wedschilde.livejournal.com]

oh yes. :::nods:::

[martianmooncrab.livejournal.com]

*coated in Extra Extra Virgin Olive Oil*

[lagilman]

the original discussion was mud wrestling, actually. The first quoted speaker changed it to nude, 'cause he's just a perv that way. *adjusts halo, smirks in his direction*

[kellylaymon.livejournal.com]

Eh. Make it some combination of Philip Seymour Hoffman, Paul Giamatti, Jason Segel, Seth MacFarlane, Jimmy Kimmel, or Paul Rudd, and I'll bring the champagne and crabcakes.

[fakefrenchie.livejournal.com]

Isn't that kind of, well, sexist? LOL

[lagilman]

Well, sexual appreciation is certainly involved, and could be considered sexist and therefore offensive. However we are, IMO, appreciating performers in a non-intrusive and non-derogatory way. I see nothing wrong with that, no matter what gender is admiring what gender. YMMV and that's fair and reasonable.

[and we're admiring a wide range of menfolk, in terms of age, appearances, and attributes. So while it may be gender-based, it's also inclusive... I challenge straight guys/lesbians to consider women in the same ranges as sexually-appreciated individuals. Come on, everyone can play....]

[vierran45.livejournal.com]

Where do I sign up?

[vampry.livejournal.com]

*gets in line for tickets*

*fans self*

[wolfsilveroak.livejournal.com]

Person 2: "Hell, make it a tag-team match -- Neil Gaiman & Taye Diggs v. Hugh Jackman and Viggo Mortensen -- and *I'll* buy a ticket."


Hell, I'll buy ringside seats!

[mmegaera.livejournal.com]

Holy cow. You don't know me, but can I have a ticket, too??? Pretty please?