submitted without com... oh hell.
Apr. 22nd, 2006 02:31 pmThe very definition of WTF? fannish style. Everything detractors sneer at, paraded in full view of the attorneys...
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1933456027/002-4876564-3915249?%5Fencoding=UTF8&s=books&v=glance
I don't even want to bitchslap this person, unless I can use someone else's hand.
ETA: One of the suggested Amazon.com 'tags' given this book: "is yoda gonna have to smack a bitch" *dies*
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1933456027/002-4876564-3915249?%5Fencoding=UTF8&s=books&v=glance
I don't even want to bitchslap this person, unless I can use someone else's hand.
ETA: One of the suggested Amazon.com 'tags' given this book: "is yoda gonna have to smack a bitch" *dies*
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 06:47 pm (UTC)How can she -- No...
Oh good gads! WTF indeed!!!!!!!!!!!!
and furthermore...
Date: 2006-04-22 07:08 pm (UTC)Re: and furthermore...
Date: 2006-04-22 07:15 pm (UTC)And, babe? Once you take money for it, no matter how you take money for it? You've crossed the Rubicon, and the lawyers will be waiting on the other side.
Re: and furthermore...
Date: 2006-04-22 07:55 pm (UTC)What scares me most is that this woman is allegedly a publishing professional. She should have known clearly what the laws were on this. Hell, every fanficcer I know clearly knows what the laws are, and most try to steer clear of that line.
The reprecussions of this are not gonna be pretty for anyone.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 06:49 pm (UTC)*points to icon*
There's a lot of crazy and entitlement in the world.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 07:45 pm (UTC)*sigh*
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 08:04 pm (UTC)http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0595382371/ref=cm_srchresults_product/002-8314090-7598432?%5Fencoding=UTF8&v=glance&n=283155
The "author" of this Mary Sue missive took serious exception to the one-star review she received.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 08:58 pm (UTC)Dude. Copyrights are not to be messed with.
Scary how many people out there seem to need a visit from the Clue Fairy...
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 11:00 pm (UTC)Hello? This is not good.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 08:57 pm (UTC)I'm looking forward to seeing Amazon get splattered with the results. Someone was asleep at the gate, there.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 09:38 pm (UTC)The excuse Amazon will go with is the one that they have on hand for the works about a show (Firefly and religion; Texts on Harry Potter including guides; you know of what I speak) the "academic" text as it were that publishers have been using to skirt the copyright issue for yeeeaaars. They will claim that they thought it was some book like a technobabble guide to Star Wars.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 09:44 pm (UTC)*snorfle* I can just imagine....
no subject
Date: 2006-04-23 11:57 am (UTC)It was TX-1929 and TX-2342 ma'am. They'll be written into her 'subsequent novels.'
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 09:42 pm (UTC)Because they can't tell, at a distance, who's going to be reasonable and who's going to be an ignorant *expletive*, and so everyone gets caught, cooked, and basted with the same brush.
Not to compare this woman to a turkey, or anything. Really. That would be an insult to turkeys.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-23 02:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 11:06 pm (UTC)Yep. Listed at Amazon, the idiots. Amazon, that is. If they don't start controlling what they list, they are going to find themselves paying big fines.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-22 11:26 pm (UTC)Did you read the back cover????? She found someone to BLURB it. And they reference Star Trek.
I just got up, but I think I have to lie down again ...
no subject
Date: 2006-04-23 03:22 am (UTC)I mean ... a fanfic of Prince William - it even says fanfiction on the cover: WTF????
no subject
Date: 2006-04-23 04:07 am (UTC)As for Prince Willian fanfic? Okay. That's it. I'm cooked. I'm done. I'm outa here ...
no subject
Date: 2006-04-23 03:25 pm (UTC)It's called RLF or RPF -- real life or real person fanfic. Some of them are... well, mostly harmless. often even amusing ("Real Actor sucked into Role-Universe" sort of thing, etc). Some of them take that step into wish fulfillment scariness of the smut sort.
Those are, IMPO, the shortest route to
wantingneeding the mental brillo ever discovered. Ugh. And also, ick. And no, I'm not going to apologize for thinking so, no matter how many people try to defend their position. It's just... too privacy-invading for me to condone.You can make an argument about (ab)using created characters. You canNOT claim the same for using a real live person, no matter how public a figure they may be.
The quick and dirty rule I have is "would they be uncomfortable having their (theoretical) kids/parents/loved ones stumble across it on-line?" If you suspect the answer might, even remotely be yes, then it shouldn't ever be posted.
[/mini-rant]
no subject
Date: 2006-04-24 01:45 am (UTC)Screw you, ducky. Smutting up another living person's life for your own possibly sexual amusement/gratification and making said smut available in a public forum is gross, it's mentally unbalanced and I will not apologise for calling you on it. Yes, Virginia, some things are just plain Wrong, and all the bleating self-justificatin in the world doesn't change that.
See? I can rant too ... *g*
We'll never stop it, Suri, but we can condemn it wherever we find it, we can challenge these revolting people's fantasy that there are no ramifications or consequences to their behaviour ... and maybe some of them will think twice before doing it again.
What gets me the most is the folk who do this stuff would be the first to go apeshit if someone did it to them.
Sheesh.