bitchslapping the government. Again.
May. 18th, 2005 07:19 amSo. The government is saying now that Medicaid will start paying for Viagra. At taxpayer cost. Because "a large percentage of men are affected by ED in some form or another." And "it will affect their married life and cause problems at home."
But they won't pay for all forms of birth control.
Because ALL women are affected by the risk of pregnancy. And that won't affect their lives at all, no. /bitter sarcasm.
There's no need to rant on this. If you give a damn at all, speak out. If you don't... get suck with the results of someone else deciding for you.
But they won't pay for all forms of birth control.
Because ALL women are affected by the risk of pregnancy. And that won't affect their lives at all, no. /bitter sarcasm.
There's no need to rant on this. If you give a damn at all, speak out. If you don't... get suck with the results of someone else deciding for you.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 01:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-19 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 03:12 pm (UTC)I think we need to put together teams of people, snatch the women that belong to the religious right and put them through anti-brainwashing therapy. Cause it is the only explaination why they support a dogma that would make them servile chattel beholden unto men.
Here is an interesting link to a story written by a young woman who proudly declares that she is her father's property because that is how God wanted it. Later in the article she goes on to say that she remains her father's property "until marriage when there is a lawful change of ownership." GAG!
http://www.patriarchspath.org/Articles/Docs/Daddys_Girl.htm
This is why we tossed the Taliban out of power, we don't need the christian version here in the US.
Here is a link to an article on a vaccine to stop HPV (Human Papilloma Virus). A widespread STD that is responsible for 70% of all cervical cancer affecting 10,000 women yearly and killing 4,000 per year in the US alone. The christian right are opposed because they feel that it will encourage women to have sex!
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050530&s=pollitt
And lastly, there is a bill before the Ohio legislature that at one point describes a sexual act as the inserting of any body part or object into the vaginal cavity. So ladies, remember that next time you use a tampon or douche you are having sex. GAG!
I am starting to consider buying firearms. The nice thing about the far right wing is that they are making that easier to accomplish. It might be time to put some of our liberal sensibilities aside and stock up on some firepower for our own safety. We KNOW the opposition is armed.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 03:13 pm (UTC)You're free to disagree with
It isn't right, it isn't fair. I don't buy the argument that abortion is murder, therefore (by some wild extrapolation, apparently) birth control is some kind of preemptive murder.
I write my my representatives and senators regularly. It doesn't do any good, but I write all the same.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 03:25 pm (UTC)Neither is the reason why a lot of men take erectile aids. You don't need to prove ED to get Viagra, you just have to have a doctor who is willing to write a 'script because "I don't get it up as often as I used to."
If Viagra, etc, were used only to treat established and verifiable diseases, I'd have a lot less objection to it being covered by medical insurance. I'd still insist on all ob/gyn fees being equally covered, though...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 03:32 pm (UTC)As for the young lady who belongs to Daddy, it sounds, too, as if she belongs to the gimmes. Let her pull that crap in B-school or in financial services...well, she's 19. Frankly, there's stuff about her bio that makes me wonder how much of it is fake or puffed up.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 07:25 pm (UTC)Ask any guy
Date: 2005-05-18 09:45 pm (UTC)Men, as a whole regard this as a disease. I have no valid statistics to support this, and only the sketchiest of apocryphal data. An informal survey of the electricians, technicians and every mechanic I could find in this place seems to support my theory that men consider ED a serious disease. Most men I asked today said they would rather have cancer. Men are pretty damn attached to their penises.
Unfair as it is, we will probably have to wait for a viable male contraceptive that doesn't involve abstinence or condoms before they'll be covered.
Re: Ask any guy
Date: 2005-05-18 10:02 pm (UTC)No. And again, No.
Why should we? Why should we accept unfairness because MALES AREN'T DIRECTLY AFFECTED?
Re: Ask any guy
Date: 2005-05-19 05:23 pm (UTC)We shouldn't.
I may have inadvertently portrayed myself as the enemy.
I wasn't suggesting toleration. It is to deny legitimate health care to more than half the population under any conditions. It's execrable to do so while providing what are essentially recreational drugs to the smaller population merely because they have a "Y" chromosome.
I was speculating about the root cause of this injustice, not condoning it. When I'm king, things will be different.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 05:47 pm (UTC)excellent inadvertant typo. it does suck, and I'm still pissed.
Does it really surprise us?
Date: 2005-05-18 06:57 pm (UTC)Let me see now... The only reason to pay for Viagra is to increase quality of life... The only improvement that Viagra presents is an improved sex life...
And contraceptives don't do the same?! This is purely sexist/bible-humping BS!
Re: Does it really surprise us?
Date: 2005-05-18 07:12 pm (UTC)What about mammograms, sonograms, and Pap smears, as I said before.
What about treatment for genital herpes?
If it's not sex/fertility, it doesn't get dealt with. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
Re: Does it really surprise us?
Date: 2005-05-18 11:47 pm (UTC)Infuriating that there are people out there who just refuse to understand. But stupidity is still legal and, unfortunately in many cases, encouraged among the voting public.
So I keep writing my representatives, and contributing to women's and human rights causes, and voting.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 07:55 pm (UTC)lack ofconscience clauses by pharmacists would be if a lot of pharmacists started refusing to dispense Viagra on moral grounds.no subject
Date: 2005-05-18 08:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-19 10:11 am (UTC)Insanity.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-20 02:33 pm (UTC)