Anyone have an Ashcroft vodoo doll handy?
Feb. 27th, 2004 08:00 amA pretty no-frills article.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Justice Department has subpoenaed
hundreds of medical records from six Planned Parenthood
sites as part of the governments defense in lawsuits
challenging the Partial-Birth Abortion Act.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Abortion-Records.html?ex=1078886388&ei=1&en=755b71268a9da95f
Every commentary I've read in the past few weeks agrees that there is no way today to guarantee that identities will be protected, even if the names are edited out. That's more than scary. That's terrifying.
And, again, I ask why they need these documents? Surely, before they banned the proceedure, they had enough evidence to support the fact that it was a danger to society?
(mind you, I support the ban in most cases. But I also believe in inexpensive birth control and the morning after pill and first trimester abortions on-demand, and all those other things that allow me my own personal freedom to decide if I'm going to be a parent or not. Since I, unlike a male, don't have the option to ignore the question.)
Do I believe that, if they're given these records, it will stop there? No, I don't. Not with Ashcroft in charge. This will give them precedent to get pretty much any records they want.
I didn't used to be this bitter. I also didn't used to feel this much under attack on my personal freedoms and choices, every time I turned around.
I feel the heart-sick need for a dandelion break coming on.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Justice Department has subpoenaed
hundreds of medical records from six Planned Parenthood
sites as part of the governments defense in lawsuits
challenging the Partial-Birth Abortion Act.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Abortion-Records.html?ex=1078886388&ei=1&en=755b71268a9da95f
Every commentary I've read in the past few weeks agrees that there is no way today to guarantee that identities will be protected, even if the names are edited out. That's more than scary. That's terrifying.
And, again, I ask why they need these documents? Surely, before they banned the proceedure, they had enough evidence to support the fact that it was a danger to society?
(mind you, I support the ban in most cases. But I also believe in inexpensive birth control and the morning after pill and first trimester abortions on-demand, and all those other things that allow me my own personal freedom to decide if I'm going to be a parent or not. Since I, unlike a male, don't have the option to ignore the question.)
Do I believe that, if they're given these records, it will stop there? No, I don't. Not with Ashcroft in charge. This will give them precedent to get pretty much any records they want.
I didn't used to be this bitter. I also didn't used to feel this much under attack on my personal freedoms and choices, every time I turned around.
I feel the heart-sick need for a dandelion break coming on.