Copyedit Slogging

[lagilman]

Normally, I’m all about digital. Hitting “send” on a manuscript is a hell of a lot better than printing it out and slogging it to the post awful, hoping against hope that nothing eats it en route to NYC. But when it comes to copyedits, I admit, I miss the days of paper edits, post-its, and red pen STETs.

Digital queries are just, somehow, more annoying.

And of all the elements of making a book, there is nothing glamorous about a writer going through a copyedit.

You start with a fresh cup of coffee and maybe something healthy to munch on, and by the end of the first day you’re surrounded by two empty coffee mugs, a half-full mug of tea, a water glass, a wine glass, the remains of your re-heated dinner shoved to one side, and increasingly snarky retorts in the margins, feeling like someone ran over your brain with a snowplow, and wishing dreadful fates on the copyeditor* who wants you to adhere strictly to Strunk & White, even in dialogue…

And there’s still another 240 pages to go.

Rinse and repeat, tomorrow.









*not all copyeditors, obviously. But enough of the breed prize conformity and rules over creativity and voice to make conflict inevitable.

Comments

[desperance.livejournal.com]

See now, in the old days, I would go through a copy-edit and scrawl "stet" in the margins - again and again - and that would be that. These days, I feel obliged - because we can, we have that option - to justify every instance in the margin, to explain why I'm stetting. It takes for ever, and does no bloody good.

[dickgloucester.livejournal.com]

You have my deepest sympathies.

[editrx.livejournal.com]

I work for your publisher still. Request me next time.... :)

[lagilman]

Suspect we'll keep the same CE for all 3 books in the series, but will put your name out for the next project with 'em!