rant rant rant rant
Feb. 10th, 2014 02:18 pmI'm sorry, everyone, but an otherwise peaceful Monday has been interrupted by asshattery, and I need to rant (without giving specifics, so if you don't already know what set this off, you probably won't care...).
How fucking difficult is it to comprehend what 'freedom of speech" means, and what the First Amendment protects - and what it doesn't?
Hint: it doesn't restrict a private organization's right to say "we won't publish sexist, racist, or ableist material, as we do not feel that those things reflect well on who we are or the face we wish to show to the public."
(leaving aside the related but separate questions of "why do you think our professional publication should allow insulting-to-other-member comments go unreviewed?" and "how do otherwise intelligent people not understand the word "censor" and "infringe?" Because refusing-to-publish in one venue does not mean you can't take your words elsewhere. It just means your words are not appropriate to that forum, thanks for submitting. Big writer panties time, kids. Pull 'em up.)
Looking at the names of the people who signed that petition, even assuming they never saw the original draft that's now circulating - it makes me sad.
How fucking difficult is it to comprehend what 'freedom of speech" means, and what the First Amendment protects - and what it doesn't?
Hint: it doesn't restrict a private organization's right to say "we won't publish sexist, racist, or ableist material, as we do not feel that those things reflect well on who we are or the face we wish to show to the public."
(leaving aside the related but separate questions of "why do you think our professional publication should allow insulting-to-other-member comments go unreviewed?" and "how do otherwise intelligent people not understand the word "censor" and "infringe?" Because refusing-to-publish in one venue does not mean you can't take your words elsewhere. It just means your words are not appropriate to that forum, thanks for submitting. Big writer panties time, kids. Pull 'em up.)
Looking at the names of the people who signed that petition, even assuming they never saw the original draft that's now circulating - it makes me sad.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-10 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-10 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-10 10:54 pm (UTC)I was going to write more, but I think you covered it.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-10 10:58 pm (UTC)The amusing thing is, the guy spearheading it...isn't even a member of SFWA, as per recent rolls.
And yeah - the people who have signed on to this... well, respect levels are lowering.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-10 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-11 06:41 am (UTC)Rant understood, and seconded.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-11 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-11 04:07 pm (UTC)Several others where already on my nebulous list of 'I'm not going to read their blogs/personal postings because I'm afraid of what I might find out and I like their books too much'
I'm happy to be more specific, but you left all the names out so I'm following suit in your space.