dialogue this morning:
"I have no patience with willful ignorance. Or emotional avoidance. Fuckin' irritates me."
"So, you've got no use for most for humanity, then."
"That does seem to sum it up, dunnit?"
-----------------------------------------
Professional writer on a closed track
Today I woke up early, revised a lot of pages, went for a walk in the snow, took an involuntary, cat-supervised nap, revised more pages, and ate random bits of food as my stomach reminded me. There are submissions queued up for reading tonight, when I can't revise any more. It's been a very odd day, one of several in a row, and my brain and body are both telling me, in increasingly loud voices, that I need a damn break before I break.
Tomorrow, more revising (hopefully to be done) and then I'm off to the NY wine expo to both taste wine and see if I can make a few useful research contacts. Then another few days of intense work under both the writing and editing hats, and then I'm off to Dublin for a combination research trip/P'con weekend.
I suppose somewhere in there I'll sneak in some non-working time off?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A tweet, originally in three parts:
Much of world-building in a story involves backing away from what you know & considering the structural logic of your world.
Logic is not optional. Internal consistency develops & informs your world, making it both real & true.
It's also a lot harder than just making shit up. #amwriting
[brought to you courtesy of the half hour I spent trying to figure out if, in the world of the Vinearts, blackpowder would have been a viable and realistic development, and if so, would it have spread to the Lands Vin by the time of my story. There is no right answer and no matter what I choose or why, someone will claim I'm doin' it wrong.]
"I have no patience with willful ignorance. Or emotional avoidance. Fuckin' irritates me."
"So, you've got no use for most for humanity, then."
"That does seem to sum it up, dunnit?"
-----------------------------------------
Professional writer on a closed track
Today I woke up early, revised a lot of pages, went for a walk in the snow, took an involuntary, cat-supervised nap, revised more pages, and ate random bits of food as my stomach reminded me. There are submissions queued up for reading tonight, when I can't revise any more. It's been a very odd day, one of several in a row, and my brain and body are both telling me, in increasingly loud voices, that I need a damn break before I break.
Tomorrow, more revising (hopefully to be done) and then I'm off to the NY wine expo to both taste wine and see if I can make a few useful research contacts. Then another few days of intense work under both the writing and editing hats, and then I'm off to Dublin for a combination research trip/P'con weekend.
I suppose somewhere in there I'll sneak in some non-working time off?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A tweet, originally in three parts:
Much of world-building in a story involves backing away from what you know & considering the structural logic of your world.
Logic is not optional. Internal consistency develops & informs your world, making it both real & true.
It's also a lot harder than just making shit up. #amwriting
[brought to you courtesy of the half hour I spent trying to figure out if, in the world of the Vinearts, blackpowder would have been a viable and realistic development, and if so, would it have spread to the Lands Vin by the time of my story. There is no right answer and no matter what I choose or why, someone will claim I'm doin' it wrong.]
no subject
Date: 2010-02-27 12:16 am (UTC)"So, you've got no use for most for humanity, then."
"That does seem to sum it up, dunnit?"
Were you in my kitchen, like... pretty much any given day? Because I often have this conversation as well.
Also, the stuff about world-building, I'm making notes because I suspect I'ma be referrin' to the a lot in the coming days.
I'm a'skeered, I am, meerkat, at what I'm getting myself into.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-27 12:24 am (UTC)*points* Virgo. We analyze and engage our intellectual and emotional shit, and expect other people to as well. It's both a strength (for us) and a frustration (when dealing with those who just Can't or Won't).
no subject
Date: 2010-02-27 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-27 12:41 am (UTC)"So, you've got no use for most for humanity, then."
"That does seem to sum it up, dunnit?"
Have you been sitting in on some of my conference calls from work again?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-27 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-27 11:53 am (UTC)Historians. They are out to get us.
I'm one myself. It makes for Teh Confused.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-27 12:56 pm (UTC)Nah, Historicans nitpick. I'm cool with that, because if you say "yeah, I thought about X (the fact that gunpowder is Asian in assumed origin) and considered Y (Japan and most of China aren't well-known in this world-iteration) and Z (there is no Islamic movement to bring the trade- or military swirl to the Western world..., not to mention there were no large-scale wars to bring gunpowder into development on a wider scale" you can get them to back off and say "okay, yeah, I see your problem...."
It's the Know Something/Assume Everything nitpickers who make me crazy, like the writer obviously Didn't Understand Their World... (or didn't bother to do any research).