There is Chaos in Ch. Felidae this morning, and a to-do list that makes me whimper, so will just throw this Open to a discussion of whatever folk want to ask -- or, yannow, a Leveragefest of squeee. :-)
[personally, I thought the plot was weak even by Leverage standards (you could tell that this wasn't originally written to be Season 2b's opener, as the pacing was more of 2nd or 3rd episode), but the #funtrain was under full steam and dragging me along -- I watched just to see the two alphas of Nate and Tara work their shit out (and dash the expectations of 3/4 of fandom, it seemed, who expected it would be the rest of the team who had trouble with her, not Nate. Nicely played, writers, nicely played). Very much looking forward to next week's episode. And can we talk about the "she's hot" reaction? Because I thought the guys did a nice job of conveying the expected "did she say that?" with a more Parker-specific "she just said that" that turned the scene from the usual "heh heh girlsex!" take into something a little a little more nuanced.]
[Oh, and OMG Nate you almost had a good outfit there. Almost. Had you just stopped three accessories earlier...keep the fan, and the hand-candy. Lose the stickpin and the...were those boots? Oy. Return of the Bad Hat Brigade, Accessories Division]
[personally, I thought the plot was weak even by Leverage standards (you could tell that this wasn't originally written to be Season 2b's opener, as the pacing was more of 2nd or 3rd episode), but the #funtrain was under full steam and dragging me along -- I watched just to see the two alphas of Nate and Tara work their shit out (and dash the expectations of 3/4 of fandom, it seemed, who expected it would be the rest of the team who had trouble with her, not Nate. Nicely played, writers, nicely played). Very much looking forward to next week's episode. And can we talk about the "she's hot" reaction? Because I thought the guys did a nice job of conveying the expected "did she say that?" with a more Parker-specific "she just said that" that turned the scene from the usual "heh heh girlsex!" take into something a little a little more nuanced.]
[Oh, and OMG Nate you almost had a good outfit there. Almost. Had you just stopped three accessories earlier...keep the fan, and the hand-candy. Lose the stickpin and the...were those boots? Oy. Return of the Bad Hat Brigade, Accessories Division]
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 02:10 pm (UTC)The plot-logic often isn't (the term "funtrain" comes from the showrunner himself, reportedly, explaining the whole 'sometimes you just have to sit back and say "let it ride"' mentality of a good caper storyline, to the point where they've actually used it in the show itself, hello meta) but it's great fun when they get rolling, and has one of the highest levels of competence porn* of any show on television after Criminal Minds. The fact that the show's on TNT is one of the few things that keeps me from dumping cable.
*smart people doing their jobs well, particularly the planning and discussion thereof.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 02:28 pm (UTC)I'm also pleased that it runs an hour after L&O: SVU and not at the same time. Totally different shows. I like SVU (wouldn't record it if I didn't), but I also like having a lighter show afterward.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 12:36 am (UTC)[the fact that they referenced her low EQ was nice, but I'd rather see it]
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 03:23 pm (UTC)::sighs:: Funtrain indeed. After yesterday's chaos, I needed it.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 04:02 pm (UTC)I liked how she was clearly getting her panties in a twist over the chemistry between Nate and Tara.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 04:21 pm (UTC)Or, yknow, she could be jet-setting on someone else's credit card. Breakfast in Paris, after-dinner drinks in Cape Town, morning coffee while the sun rises over Jerusalem....
(and then crashing with jet lag for a week, after)
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 12:39 am (UTC)But I'm not a big Nate/Sophie 'shipper. They weren't who they were, when they had the flirtation-dance pre-show, and now it's just getting tired. Much more interesting when she's in full-on grifter mode, and he's trying to keep her (and the rest of them) in check and on-target. But we'll see what happens.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 03:44 pm (UTC)"Exactly. Wait -- what?"
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 04:18 pm (UTC)On the other hand, if she is that good of a friend to Sophie, and knows why Sophie left, then it could be a subtle way of poking S into returning. If the writers play that up, then kudos to them -- one player playing the other for her own good, and Tara's not such a hardliner after all [which was sort of implied in the way she looked at her check, at the end].
We'll have to see.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 05:34 pm (UTC)And I could see your theory being true, as well. *grin*
no subject
Date: 2010-01-14 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-15 12:41 am (UTC)