As part of my office rearrangement, I set aside an area for my manuscripts, in all their various stages* (revision, draft, page proofs, etc). Each one has a yellow sticky tag on it, identifying the manuscript and the stage, and is stored on a shelf.
I just looked down and realized it's exactly the same set-up I used to keep track of what I was editing/putting through production, back In The Day (those of you who ever saw my office will remember the Wall O' Manuscripts). Well, hell, it worked back then....
Do you find yourself returning to certain organizational tactics? Or are you always searching for that Organizational Grail that will make the work flow better? What's worked for you/what hasn't?
*I try to keep a paperless office, but there are some things I find easier to do on hardcopy, and some things the publishers still send in hardcopy, so...
I just looked down and realized it's exactly the same set-up I used to keep track of what I was editing/putting through production, back In The Day (those of you who ever saw my office will remember the Wall O' Manuscripts). Well, hell, it worked back then....
Do you find yourself returning to certain organizational tactics? Or are you always searching for that Organizational Grail that will make the work flow better? What's worked for you/what hasn't?
*I try to keep a paperless office, but there are some things I find easier to do on hardcopy, and some things the publishers still send in hardcopy, so...
no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 04:04 pm (UTC)I've found recently that as my experience and needs change/improve my approach to the work changes. I am moving toward fewer drafts. I used to keep all my research in my head and only occasionally referred back to the books I keep on my shelves, but now have a research organization program where I put every tidbit that might be pertinent later on. I have way too many research books these days to be able to remember where I read a certain item. I also mark the books up more, and have a better sense of what I'm going to refer to later on.
So, to answer your question, I'm still adjusting.
Paperless office? I'm moving that direction. I threw out about a ton of hard copies of old manuscripts and photocopies of very old articles I wrote. If it's on disk, I don't bother keeping a hard copy any more. For editing drafts, I toss the hard copy as soon as I've entered the changes. However, I don't do freelance editing like you do, and don't have to keep hard copies of other people's manuscripts. Most of the paper in my office is published books.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 04:06 pm (UTC)I'll start another shelf for client manuscripts, as needed.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 04:55 pm (UTC)I'm an artist man, I don't do organization. It clutters up my feng shui channels and prevents me from thinking existential thoughts.
(buy it?)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 06:01 pm (UTC)As I read your post, I was thinking, "gee, just like in her old office..."
I rely on my librarian-system for tracking to-do projects - it worked for me then, and so far, it's panning out now...
Oh - I like the new blog design!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 06:41 pm (UTC)I'm pretty much a paper-based lifeform, regularly slaughtering entire forests. It's intrinsic to how I write--I think about the story differently when I'm staring at a printout versus words on a screen.
My holy grail is an office assistant who would periodically tidy the things I'll never get to because they are always at the bottom of the priority stack :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 07:29 pm (UTC)Not even on a discount with free shipping.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 07:33 pm (UTC)I'm going to go clean my feng shui now...
no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 10:31 pm (UTC)This means that, a hundred years after my death, people who study the genius of my work will have nothing to work with but the final version, the early drafts of a few synopses rescued by my more diligent descendents, and a precious handful of blog entries saved to a creaking hard drive. I'll be as mysterious as Shakespeare!
no subject
Date: 2008-12-08 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 12:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 03:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 03:11 am (UTC)As I read your post, I was thinking, "gee, just like in her old office..."
Except there at any given time I had, what, 50? 60 manuscripts? I look back at that now and am amazed it took me so long to burn out. How do people do that for jobs they don't love?
Oh - I like the new blog design!
I miss some things about the old style, but am loving things about the new. So it all evens out...
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 09:06 am (UTC)All the non-writing related stuff is filed in boxes. For the business, it's a work in progress - my partner is one of those people who can turn a tidy office into a post-tornado wasteland in 10 minutes, but he has a very determined PA who believes that if she can handle Canary Wharf, she can sort out Trevor. Thus far, she's winning. For the Chamber of Commerce, I have a secretary.
This is not to say that the house is tidy, however.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 09:35 pm (UTC)