Democracy*: It's what's for dinner.
Nov. 4th, 2008 06:28 pmPolls closing. Parties gathering. Anticipation mounting.
I'm half-tempted to go to bed and wake up tomorrow to whatever New World Order we've got...
(that idea was hooted down. SO I guess I'll be playing drinking games with the rest of ya.)
EtA: who is drinking what? I thought I'd had enough scotch at WFC, but the bottle of Aberlour was spirited up by the peat-fairies. And so there we are.
and courtesy of
cmpriest:
*okay, a representative democracy. If we can get those participation numbers up, then maybe we can call ourselves a realistic democracy with a straight face...)
I'm half-tempted to go to bed and wake up tomorrow to whatever New World Order we've got...
(that idea was hooted down. SO I guess I'll be playing drinking games with the rest of ya.)
EtA: who is drinking what? I thought I'd had enough scotch at WFC, but the bottle of Aberlour was spirited up by the peat-fairies. And so there we are.
and courtesy of
*okay, a representative democracy. If we can get those participation numbers up, then maybe we can call ourselves a realistic democracy with a straight face...)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 01:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 02:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 02:41 am (UTC)Sorry.
And yeah, I'm being very dubious about calling a state with less than 50% reporting, even if it looks like a blowout.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 02:42 am (UTC)I was going to ignore the results 'till morning, but I'm too curious. I'm really worried about Prop. 8 (I'm in California); I never thought Prop. 22 would pass those years ago, but it did. Vast anxiety.
I'm going to try to walk away from the computer, and listen to a podcast (Lime&Violet) and knit, to distract and amuse myself.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 02:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 02:54 am (UTC)With all the history of voter intimidation by the GOP they really have no cause to cry foul on that account...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 06:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 12:36 pm (UTC)But I'm not sure how they're figuring all the early voting....
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:56 am (UTC)*** Highest turnout rate since '08 -- 1908: Provided the number stands, the turnout rate for yesterday's election was the highest in 100 years, according to the estimate from turnout guru Dr. Michael McDonald at George Mason University. Almost 137 million (136,631,825) went to the polls -- 64.1% of the voting-eligible population. 1960 saw 63.7% of the populace go out to vote; In 1908, 65.7% voted. It was, of course, the most people ever to go to the polls topping 2004's 122 million. That's 12% increase from 2004. For those wondering why the current total vote in the presidential adds up to approximately 117 million, note that it's going to climb. There is still a ton of vote missing on the West coast.
That site also talks about Obama's "4-legged chair" -- in addition to the 'stool' of blacks, Hispanics and the 18-29 year old bracket, he also picked up a larger percentage of college-educated whites than Kerry claimed in 2004.
Based on some of the comments I've seen posted in that forum and others, he didn't get the frightened, mean-spirited, and plain-out bigoted vote. Nice to know they're not the majority...