a probably hypothetical moral quandry
Oct. 26th, 2006 10:51 amor, "If I am my brother's keeper, does that mean I can charge admission?"
I have a friend. Let's call this friend George.
George has a tendency to straight shooting and straight thinking, and assumes everyone else will be glad for both being shot and being thought at.
In this imperfect world, that is not always the case.
George has had ample years and friendly warnings to learn that fact, and yet it eludes, every time.
So. Watching George about to pull those straight-shooting guns once again, am I morally obligated in any way shape or form to warn my friend that it's probably going to backfire spectacularly? Or can I sit back and watch, assured that none of the resulting splatter is going to reach me?
And if I benefit from George's cluelessness (i.e. a project George might have gotten comes to me, instead), is there real guilt (as opposed to 'poor idiot George, wish you'd learn" sort) attached?
I have a friend. Let's call this friend George.
George has a tendency to straight shooting and straight thinking, and assumes everyone else will be glad for both being shot and being thought at.
In this imperfect world, that is not always the case.
George has had ample years and friendly warnings to learn that fact, and yet it eludes, every time.
So. Watching George about to pull those straight-shooting guns once again, am I morally obligated in any way shape or form to warn my friend that it's probably going to backfire spectacularly? Or can I sit back and watch, assured that none of the resulting splatter is going to reach me?
And if I benefit from George's cluelessness (i.e. a project George might have gotten comes to me, instead), is there real guilt (as opposed to 'poor idiot George, wish you'd learn" sort) attached?
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:04 pm (UTC)But I also just got talked down from nailing someone to a wall in my own LJ for incompetent work product, so I'm probably not the best one to talk right now. ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:09 pm (UTC)And again, in that "He's been warned," vein-- if the project happens to fall in your lap as a result of the cluelessness he's been (repeatedly) warned about, you've got nothing to feel guilty about.
"Poor George" sentiments are certainly okay.
Just my .02, but then again, I'm sort of mean that way.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:18 pm (UTC)The thing is, how much of that guilt would still be there without the religious instruction? *cue raised eyebrow*
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:22 pm (UTC)Gently. Quietly. Once.
Given his past record, he probably won't get it, and he'll go ahead and be clueless anyway, and you'll get the project, but you won't have to feel guilty about it, because after all, you did warn him.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:34 pm (UTC)You get it from both parents.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:41 pm (UTC)This is not your fault.
And there is no guilt at all involved in his failing, yet again, to take advantage of your years of warnings.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 04:00 pm (UTC)So there you go...
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 04:21 pm (UTC);-D
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 05:20 pm (UTC)Simply tell George "Gee, I've had my eye on that project for a while, thanks. I could use the income." when/if the subject comes up.
Let that be the warning. And if things come back at you, remind people you were up front about your ability to get past THEIR mistakes.
(shrug)
I think people deserve warnings, but I don't think they deserve our cutting off our legs for them. If the job is there, take it if it comes to you. In a world of professionals, either you get the job or you don't. You're not going to get it because HE gave it to you, you'd get it because you're good and they trust/believe in you. He'd NOT get it because well, he'd done something they didn't want him to do.
(shrug)
But then you knew that. (lol)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 06:21 pm (UTC)Hard-wiring can be McGyvered into spraying short of sparks tho, can't it? I hold out hope.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-26 09:41 pm (UTC)Tell George once what he's planning is inadvisable, and then watch and wait. If he heeds you, fine. If he ignores you, it's a mess of his own making. If you *didn't* stand to benefit from his mistake, then perhaps letting him fail would be a good lesson. Oor if you didn't know what he was planning and you got the job on that strength, there'd be no quandary.
But if you know you can benefit from someone else's actions by witholding help, or by staying silent -- I think any resulting gain isn't going to sit too well with you. You're an ethical person, don't go against your instincts.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-27 12:58 pm (UTC)I am so pimping you for info on this one tomorrow night....