WASHINGTON - In dramatic and sometimes agonizing terms, federal disaster officials warned President Bush and his homeland security chief before Hurricane Katrina struck that the storm could breach levees, put lives at risk in New Orleans' Superdome and overwhelm rescuers, according to confidential video footage.
Bush didn't ask a single question during the final briefing before Katrina struck on Aug. 29, but he assured soon-to-be-battered state officials: "We are fully prepared."
(from an AP article)
If we can't impeach the lying, blood-stained bastard, can we put him on trial for premeditated manslaughter? Please?
Bush didn't ask a single question during the final briefing before Katrina struck on Aug. 29, but he assured soon-to-be-battered state officials: "We are fully prepared."
(from an AP article)
If we can't impeach the lying, blood-stained bastard, can we put him on trial for premeditated manslaughter? Please?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 04:46 am (UTC)I wish.
The sad thing? He probably really believed they were fully prepared, he's that kind of stupid. Unfortunately, that kind of stupid combined with that kind of power gets lots of people killed.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 06:04 am (UTC)You gotta keep your perspective!
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 07:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 08:25 am (UTC)http://iocaste212.livejournal.com/872998.html
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 08:37 am (UTC)-=Jeff=-
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 10:59 am (UTC)But then we'd have President Cheney which is no less appealing to me and in some ways more distressing....
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 11:06 am (UTC)It shows him being warned AND claiming to be fully prepared when he denied ever being warned. And that's just for starters....
As if my blood pressure wasn't already high enough.....
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 11:21 am (UTC)This isn't a military justification, or a political sidestep for expedience or further benefit-of-greater-good. This was, at the vey least, criminal malfeasance in front of witnesses. I want him put under oath and asked directly if he was responsible for needless and preventable deaths and suffering during Katrina.
_then_ we can nail him for perjury.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 12:35 pm (UTC)My read on Bush is that he is a man with a number of demons: his brother Jeb was considered more capable, he's failed at a variety of enterprises, he wouldn't have -this- job were it not for family connections and family entitlement (which drove most of his other "achievements," including his admission to universities); and now that he has -this- job, he's failed at it. And he is terrified of his parents, whom he can never satisfy.
Nixon achieved a kind of dignity in the last years of his life. Carter, who was never as successful a president as he might have been, has become a Nobel laureate. I expect similar revisionism on Clinton. In fact, I suspect it's started, driven by the utter wretchedness of his successor.
He'll be KNOWN for what he is: a bloodthirsty, ineffectual failure whose callous attacks on Iraq for perceived WMDs worsened an already disastrous situation, and a liar who abandoned the victims of Katrina and Rita because they had money.
History has very little mercy.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 01:23 pm (UTC)Remember, this is the same power structure that made a man apologize for being shot in the head and chest by the VP. Naturally the first reaction is going to be "Are you going to believe what I tell you or your lying eyes?"
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 03:03 pm (UTC)Perspective was the whole issue in that case. The perspective of the HAVES and the HAVE-NOTS. Clinton had a blowjob. The Republicans didn't have one. If the GOP had been able to get some action, they wouldn't have needed to impeach Clinton. (Maybe they need to put a line item in the budget for next time.)
Sean
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 03:06 pm (UTC)We can't shoot them. All the gun nuts are on their side.
Sean
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 05:27 pm (UTC)My only hope is that the next election cycle brings a reprieve. But if history is any clue, Georgie's crimes will go unpunished regardless. Too many politicians have too much to lose if they enforce justice on him.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 07:25 pm (UTC)Outraged? You bet I am. You don't shrug off a Cat 5, you can't say you're fully prepared. As the president of the United States, it's his job to protect us. And he failed.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-02 11:18 pm (UTC)not to mention -- why did it take 6 months for this to come to light?
and don't tell me it isn't new information... :( maybe not new to the White House, but new to folks who maybe believe Bush when he said they had no early warning about the potential magnitude of the impact
no subject
Date: 2006-03-03 05:28 pm (UTC)Funny thing that. Not all Bush haters are cut from the same cloth. We're just all heartbroken by what our country is becoming.
Pat Kirby