on the recent ever-repeating debate about F v. SF

[lagilman]

Go. Have Fun. If you happen to come to any new conclusions, send up a flare, 'k?


(I don't mean to sound so blase -- well, maybe I do, but I've been through this debate a few times before, from the intellectual and marketing sides, and that was enough for me. More power to everyone who's enjoying it, though.)

Comments

[helcat.livejournal.com]

It reminds me of the whole "what is goth" thing (or its variant, "is _______goth?") that the goths have to rehash every few years.

or that whole "what is god" thing that ... well. never mind.

[qnotku.livejournal.com]

IMHO, we're talking apples and oranged. And, I hate to say -- who really cares as long as we have quality books in both genres?

Teri

[agamisu.livejournal.com]

All I gotta say is "Bollocks."

But then I say that a lot.

And not as in the dog's.

[lagilman]

To me, to them, or just in general to the world?

[agamisu.livejournal.com]

Them, of course.

[darkesta.livejournal.com]

Yeah. Usually I can at least find the energy to blog briefly about this sort of debate, if not to actually participate. But while I respect just about everyone debating the issue, and some interesting (or at least amusing) things have been said, I just can't seem to muster the caring this time around.