Breaking News: Publishing
Mar. 22nd, 2011 03:44 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Court rejects Google Books settlement w/ Authors' Guild: http://cnet.co/hD3rYq
(and via @rosefox) Here's a copy of judge's opinion in Google digital library case http://1.usa.gov/fpA9k4
I am... pleased by this. As the decision says, digitization is a good thing... but Google overreached themselves and infringed on copyright holders' legal right to decide what is/isn't done with their work (and then told us we were 'overreacting." As with most people who use that phrase, they really meant "don't take offense while we run roughshod over you." Well, we took offense).
And now, due to that overreach, they are no longer the only kids on the digital block, but have to share the market with other players. They've lost their advantage, and they've spent $$$ in court fees that could have been avoided if they hadn't gotten greedy/lazy.
"In the end, I conclude that the ASA is not fair, adequate, and reasonable....The motion for final approval of the ASA is denied, without prejudice to renewal in the event the parties negotiate a revised settlement agreement. The motion for an award of attorneys' fees and costs is denied, without prejudice."
And so back to the table everyone goes..
EtA: my new sig file: "A copyright owner's right to exclude others from using his property is fundamental and beyond dispute." - Judge Chin, 2011
(and via @rosefox) Here's a copy of judge's opinion in Google digital library case http://1.usa.gov/fpA9k4
I am... pleased by this. As the decision says, digitization is a good thing... but Google overreached themselves and infringed on copyright holders' legal right to decide what is/isn't done with their work (and then told us we were 'overreacting." As with most people who use that phrase, they really meant "don't take offense while we run roughshod over you." Well, we took offense).
And now, due to that overreach, they are no longer the only kids on the digital block, but have to share the market with other players. They've lost their advantage, and they've spent $$$ in court fees that could have been avoided if they hadn't gotten greedy/lazy.
"In the end, I conclude that the ASA is not fair, adequate, and reasonable....The motion for final approval of the ASA is denied, without prejudice to renewal in the event the parties negotiate a revised settlement agreement. The motion for an award of attorneys' fees and costs is denied, without prejudice."
And so back to the table everyone goes..
EtA: my new sig file: "A copyright owner's right to exclude others from using his property is fundamental and beyond dispute." - Judge Chin, 2011
no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 07:52 pm (UTC)I haven't read the agreement in full, but it would not surprise me if the fact that the AG does NOT speak for a majority of those affected had something to do with it being rejected (again).
no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-22 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-23 01:20 am (UTC)In other words, Chin didn't think that the AG was properly representative, either, especially in light of 6800 class members opting out.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-23 01:36 am (UTC)"While it is true that in virtually every class action many class members are never heard from, the difference is that in other class actions class members are merely releasing "claims" for damages for purported past aggrievements. In contrast, here class members would be giving up certain property rights in their creative works, and they would be deemed -- by their silence -- to have granted to Google a license to future use of their copyrighted works.:"
Judge Chin did Not Approve.
no subject
Date: 2011-03-23 02:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-23 02:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-03-23 02:24 am (UTC)