EtA: I really didn't think this post would raise so much apparent confusion. The hardcopy, physical books are in stores now (I've signed a number of them already) and shipped from the major online retailers. There was no hard laydown date that can be enforced on these titles, but the difference between "May 1st" as the publication date and "April 15th' (when the first copy was sighted in stores) is a bit extreme, and causes the problems I cited. It also plays up the difference in time between availability of print and digital, when the digital adheres to the month-of-pub release, which is why I posted in the first place.
That is all. You may return to your mid-morning coffee, now.
---------------------------------
For those of you wondering why the digitial version of HARD MAGIC is "on-sale May 1" but the paper edition is available now?
It's not that publishers/booksellers hate ebook readers, or any other conspiracy theory. The official, legal publication date for HARD MAGIC is... (wait for it...) May 1st. The digital download won't (shouldn't) be released until then, exactly as it's supposed to be.
The stores that are selling hardcopy now? Totally jumped the gun and put the books out too early. They'd jump the gun on ebooks too, I'm sure, except they can't claim "the clerks didn't understand they were supposed to wait/we didn't have backroom storage for the books")
While that's great news for those of us who hate waiting, it sucks for authors for two reasons.
1. Genre bestseller lists are compiled on a calander-month basis, so with sales split between April and May? Guess what? *sigh*
2. People who had books out in April? Lost shelf space to the incoming May books, halfway through what should have been their run. And they did it to the people in March... and so latecoming readers have trouble finding books that don't backlist (stay in the stores past their initial publication month).
This? Is one of those unspoken sales problems we're all too busy winging our hands over The Death of The Industry to pay attention to. So I just wanted to take a moment and point it out, and remind you to ASK for a book you don't see on the shelves. It might have gotten bumped, ten minutes before you came looking for it.
That is all. You may return to your mid-morning coffee, now.
---------------------------------
For those of you wondering why the digitial version of HARD MAGIC is "on-sale May 1" but the paper edition is available now?
It's not that publishers/booksellers hate ebook readers, or any other conspiracy theory. The official, legal publication date for HARD MAGIC is... (wait for it...) May 1st. The digital download won't (shouldn't) be released until then, exactly as it's supposed to be.
The stores that are selling hardcopy now? Totally jumped the gun and put the books out too early. They'd jump the gun on ebooks too, I'm sure, except they can't claim "the clerks didn't understand they were supposed to wait/we didn't have backroom storage for the books")
While that's great news for those of us who hate waiting, it sucks for authors for two reasons.
1. Genre bestseller lists are compiled on a calander-month basis, so with sales split between April and May? Guess what? *sigh*
2. People who had books out in April? Lost shelf space to the incoming May books, halfway through what should have been their run. And they did it to the people in March... and so latecoming readers have trouble finding books that don't backlist (stay in the stores past their initial publication month).
This? Is one of those unspoken sales problems we're all too busy winging our hands over The Death of The Industry to pay attention to. So I just wanted to take a moment and point it out, and remind you to ASK for a book you don't see on the shelves. It might have gotten bumped, ten minutes before you came looking for it.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 01:31 pm (UTC)My understanding with bookstores is that some books have a "strict laydown date" that they honor. If it doesn't then it gets put out on arrival. The handling and wrapping is very different.
Borders maintains lists of "strict laydown date" books.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 01:44 pm (UTC)Your digital copy? Because otherwise, yeah. That's what I was saying. So how is it a caveat? *is confuzed*
Laydown or street dates are for hardcovers and bestsellers, and there are fines/handlsapping involved with breaking those. For your everyday trade or mass market book? No such beast. But the on-publication date is still the on-pub date, and the windows still apply, as per my original post.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 02:26 pm (UTC)At what point is the print book sale counted? If your official lay-down date is May 1, I as a bookseller will have bought that book in April in order to have it for May 1. I don't see a good way for early-month releases to make the lists, unless they're really big sellers week after week.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 02:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 02:32 pm (UTC)Also, there is a difference between a laydown/street date, and a publication date. A lay-down date is, traditionally, the 2nd Tuesday of the month. A publication date changes publisher to publisher. Luna/Harlequin sets the 1st of the month as their pub date, which means that the books ship earlier, to be in stores for that date. Stores get the boxes and shift the shelves on arrival, rather than waiting. It's logical on their side..,
And yes, that is my point about the best-seller lists, although the Big'uns (NYT, USAToday) are weekly, not monthly.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 02:44 pm (UTC)And actually...bookstores (at least mine, since I buy in small quantities) do have to pay at least a little on a book they return. The Big Distributor I use only gives me back 50% of my purchase price (which was discounted to begin with). I will at least have "rented" those copies for a little while. Not sure how much, if any, of that last little slice goes back to the publisher and then on to the author for returned books. I'm not saying that's fair, you understand. Just how my particular example operates.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 02:57 pm (UTC)You're not a reporting store WRT bestseller lists, no. You'd know if you were. But I assume you report your sales to some bean counter, and the author eventually gets paid on the new copies! Because otherwise, um...
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 03:11 pm (UTC)Interesting discussion, thank you for indulging my curiosity.
(Edited for [hopefully] clarity...)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-26 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:14 pm (UTC)I also note that mobipocket.com has it, at the non-mass market paperback price of $15 or thereabouts.
Ouch.
Welcome to the new world order. Thanks Apple and Amazon...
no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 03:29 pm (UTC)As for the "non-mass-market price.." well, it's not a mass market (it's trade paperback, same as the other books), so I can see why they're not pricing it as such! Historically, when the books are issued in the cheaper format, the ebook pricing drops as well.
Right now, you can buy it in hardcopy for around $12 and e-format for $10 at BN.com.
[I've already fired my shot in the ebook discussions; am not going to get back into it now, when I have Deadlines on my heels]
no subject
Date: 2010-05-03 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 03:34 pm (UTC)Regular List Price: $13.45
Club List Price: $11.43
15% off new titles: $9.72
35% Micropay Rebate: $3.40
Cost After Rebate: $6.32
Which is very much like a mass market paperback price :) Hence my earlier confusion. While the 35% rebate may not always be available (I think they're doing a mother's day special on romance which they've listed hard magic as, go figure) it's common enough that you can almost rely on it.
I also got an additional 5% bonus rebate for choosing microsoft ereader (mobipocket still wasn't available weird) and was able to use "micropay dollars", in essence using $9.72 I'd already "spent" which was partially refilled with the roughly $4.00 in rebates
Now do you see why I like fictionwise so much? :)
Sorry to hear they're not so good from an author's point of view. Here's hoping you get your ebook royalty with minimum problems.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 03:55 pm (UTC)As for the royalties -- when someone pays me a year late and only because I squalk, the damage has been done I have no say over where my books are sold (and the more outlets the better) but they will get no more exclusive (and they demand exclusive) short fiction from me. I'll go therough BookViewCafe, where I control what's done with the work and how it's priced, etc.