And all of that without insults, straw men, or painful spelling errors!
(in fact, it took on the tone of a Sunday morning one-upmanship contest along the lines of "but wait! I have another relevant fact on that!" With emphasis on both relevant and fact.)
Part of me wants to dig in and continue to fight, and part of me wants to slip quietly off the grid.
I've accepted, however that the only time I'm good at quietly slipping away is when leaving a party. When it comes to life, I'm pretty much of the dig in and fight variety.
And so, we fight.
How to save the Affordable Care Act (again). Because if we don't speak up, they will
And if you care about the fate of non-salaried workers, call your congresscritter TODAY and speak out against the Working Families Flexibility Act (House: HR 1180; Senate: S 801). They claim it will provide workers with families more flexible schedules, but what it really does is allow employers to avoid overtime pay, and undercut the ability of the DoL to investigate abuses, rolling back decades of essential labor regulation. This may affect you, or your kid, or your cousin, or someone you never met but who is working their ass off to make ends meet, already, and doesn't deserve to have the deck stacked against them even MORE...
No, it really isn't.
"Oh, but doing X would cause problems, it's difficult, it's inconvenient."
Dog knows, I've been guilty of that myself, more than once.
Yeah, shit's annoying, it's inconvenient, it's scheduled at a bad time, or it causes traffic jams.
And yes that means forcing ourselves to act, not just the people who haven't thought about it before, or were standing in opposition. Good intentions and righteous anger don't do shit on their own.
And I was originally going to make this a private post, but you know what? No. I feel like yelling this from my porch.
reposting this from my Tumblr account
Since there seems to be some outraged confusion among Anons and Nonnys, let me clarify.
If you support the Trump/Pence/Bannon regime’s attempts to isolate, persecute, and otherwise remove basic civil and citizen’s rights from entire groups within our society, based on who they are rather than dealing with individual behavior on a case by case basis, yes I do think you’re behaving in a shitty and morally bankrupt manner, I find you personally distasteful, and I consider preventing you from carrying out your agenda(s) to be a moral obligation of a civilized nation.
And history’s got my back, on this one.
So, over the weekend, noted piece of shit Milo Yiannopoulos officially expanded his shittiness by stating that he advocates for sex with underage partners, and doesn't believe in this silly fiction of "age of consent." Adults having sex with (extreme) minors? Fine by him.
This goes beyond 'freedom of speech,' however much I abhor words that come out of his mouth. This is a man advocating sexual abuse of children (and, possibly, depending on how you read his words, having endorsed and enabled same).
His defense is that he wasn't talking about pedophilia because that's about attraction to someone without secondary sexual characteristics, but if they're sexually mature at an early age (male or female), that's ok.
And still, the CPA (Conservative Political Action Conference) is featuring him as a guest speaker, and S&S is giving him a book deal. If his contract with S&S is standard, there's a clause in it that would allow them to break that contract, if they chose to, at this point. We'll see if they choose to. Obviously, as an S&S author myself, I hope they do.
I have no expectation of CPA revoking their speaker invitation: they knew what he was when they invited him, and they seem perfectly comfortable with that being associated with them. I'd be delighted to be proven wrong, however.
Ironically but not unexpectedly, his racism and anti-semitism barely made a ripple in conservative circles, but this seems to have upset them. Because white Christian children are suddenly at risk, too. /bitter AF
"I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter."
Nowhere in that oath does it reference obedience to the president. The AG does not serve the president. The AG serves the Constitution, and the people for whom it was written.
Sally Q Yates is an American hero.
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
- Emma Lazarus
We either lift our lamp, or we shutter it and admit that we live in darkness.
I choose light.
Someone on Friday tried to tell me "this is about terrorism." That person had never been directly impacted by terrorism (I asked). Me? I was in lower Manhattan on 9/11. I saw the second plane hit the side of the Tower, staring out my office window. I smelled the air and heard the sirens, and the terrible silence after. I read the newspaper lists, and found names I knew among the dead.
You react to terrorism one of two ways. You embrace anger because it makes you feel less afraid, or you accept your fear and work through it. The former feeds the engine of terrorism. The latter starves it.
I will not feed that engine. Not with myself, and not with my neighbors.
This is a war. Some of us volunteered, some of us got drafted, and some of us got run over by the front. But we're all in it.
You just have to choose where you stand.
And today, before I go off to pour wine for folk, I'm writing a check to the ACLU, as promised: $2 for every hardcover and $1 for every trade paperback I signed this weekend at Mysterious Galaxy (and at Borderlands Books, just for the hell of it).
Discussing politics tonight with a co-worker.
Her: "Oh, well, I don't know much about X, but I'm sure it will be okay."
Me: *long stare*
She says her sister gives her the same long stare. Me, I'm thinking maybe there's a hint here she should be taking....?
History of two hundred-plus years rattling in my brain, the experience of generations that tell us "this is bad, this never works." I'm trying to find something pithy to say, something wise, and tight, but all I can think is, "and this is how America fails."
Dear World: if you are kind, remember us when you say your prayers, and send us strength for the fight.
I will not wish anyone a "Happy MLK Jr Day."
Dr. King's Life and Legacy
To the surprise of nobody who has been paying attention, the GOP is going ahead with their plan to repeal the ACA, or strip it down to uselessness. And, as of this moment, they still haven't offered up a replacement plan. So, if they succeed:
if you have a pre-existing condition (anything from arthritis to cancer, and including pregnancy!), you're screwed.
if you are low-income, and were depending on subsidized insurance to make sure you and your kids were covered? You're screwed.
if you're on Medicaid? You're screwed.
if you're 26 or under, and were counting on being able to stay on your folks' insurance while you get your career going? You're screwed.
if you were counting on insurance companies to continue carrying you/not jack up your rates five-fold after you make a claim? You're screwed.
if you have chronic illnesses and the undoing of caps on lifetime coverage will bankrupt you? You're screwed.
You might want to call your congresscritters, especially if they're Red, and let them know that, until they put forward a plan that addresses these issues, repealing the ACA is NOT what you want.
via NPR and the New York Times:
"President-elect Donald Trump's transition team has asked the State Department to list its workers who focus on gender equality and ending violence against women, in what's being seen as an echo of an earlier request for the Energy Department to list employees who work on climate change.
I’m sure there’s nothing at all untoward about their request, any more than their asking for the names of scientists who went to climate change conferences was untoward. Nope. Nothing at all disquieting about the transition team’s interest, nope.
Since Donald Trump's surprise election one month ago, there's been a bubbling conversation about the mammoth conflicts of interest he will have if he is running or even owning his far flung business enterprises while serving as the head of state. I've suggested that the whole notion of 'conflicts of interest' doesn't really capture what we're dealing with here, which is really a pretty open effort to leverage the presidency to expand his family business. But a couple things came together for me today which make me think we've all missed the real issue.
Maybe he can't divest because he's too underwater to do so or more likely he's too dependent on current and expanding cash flow to divest or even turn the reins over to someone else.
"This morning, Moody’s Analytics released a report concluding that Clinton’s economic plan would create 3.2 million jobs and accelerate growth of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP). By contrast, earlier this month, a similar (albeit contested) Moody’s analysis of Trump’s economic plan estimated that it would reduce employment (by about 3.5 million jobs), reduce economic output, and prompt a painful recession."
Moody's assessment of Trump
Moody's assessment of Clinton
I like Hillary. I don't agree with everything she's done, but I appreciate her intelligence, her pragmatism, and her ability to - often despite themselves - make allies in other camps (and countries), and get things done. Is she a professional politician? Of course she is. Politics has become a profession: amateurs don't survive.
Whatever your feeling about who should have become the nominee, it has come to this: history and math tell us that a third party candidate has no chance to win this contest. It is between Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump.
#ImWithHer because I refuse to give this country over to hate and ignorance. We can be better that that. We MUST be better than that.
(and we need to elect a Congress that will work with her. That’s part of the battle, too)
Oh, and the Senate just voted to defund Planned Parenthood again, too. And they're aiming at the ACA (again), despite the fact that it's a) working and b) certified legal by SCOTUS.
So. More guns, less health care, is that what they're saying?
Oh, wait, right. Just less actual health care for people who are middle class or below. But we can kill each other off, that's okay.
The Hunger Games, like The Handmaid's Tale, was not supposed to be a fucking MANUAL.
(Obama can and will veto the defunding. But this is what awaits us if the GOP takes the White House in 2016. And all you conservatives earning under 100,000/year? Or, god forbid, underemployed, or actually unemployed? You're going to be fucked over just as badly as the liberals. Don't kid yourself that you're going to get the golden key to the Well-To-Do Club just because you voted for them.)
I am not particularly religious - I believe in the universe, not a particular quantifiable god. But there is nothing but the work of our worst devils in the destruction of a house of god - any god, all god. It is an offense against love.
And history has never painted such arsonists in anything but the darkest colors.